These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25439760)

  • 41. Consistent cutaneous imaging with commercial digital cameras.
    Vander Haeghen Y; Naeyaert JM
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 142(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 16415385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Digital photography for the light microscope: results with a gated, video-rate CCD camera and NIH-image software.
    Shaw SL; Salmon ED; Quatrano RS
    Biotechniques; 1995 Dec; 19(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 8747661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Vessel Sampling and Blood Flow Velocity Distribution With Vessel Diameter for Characterizing the Human Bulbar Conjunctival Microvasculature.
    Wang L; Yuan J; Jiang H; Yan W; Cintrón-Colón HR; Perez VL; DeBuc DC; Feuer WJ; Wang J
    Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Mar; 42(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 25839347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ideal digital imaging system: a preliminary report.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):111-2. PubMed ID: 9228849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Computer processing of ocular photographs--a review.
    Gilchrist J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 3331732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The digital revolution, images and X-rays.
    Emmott LF
    N Y State Dent J; 2005 Jan; 71(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15768910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of garlic on conjunctival vessels: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.
    Wolf S; Reim M; Jung F
    Br J Clin Pract Suppl; 1990 Aug; 69():36-9. PubMed ID: 2083172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Scheimpflug image-processing method for accurate measurement of ocular surfaces.
    He JC; Fang Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 20457378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The megapixel digital camera: value for creating publication-quality illustrations.
    Frank MS; Dreyer KJ; Mehta A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 10511141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK; Danis RP; Hubbard LD; Florez-Arango JF; Esquivel A; Krupinski EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(7):4717-25. PubMed ID: 21345979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Low-cost endonasal digital photography.
    Nieto J; Gladstone G
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010; 26(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 20305526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema.
    Papas EB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Mar; 41(3):687-91. PubMed ID: 10711682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Multi-directional stereo viewing of MR angiography].
    Takahashi T; Sato O; Fujita M; Takeuchi Y; Kato M; Katsumori T; Ide M; Naruse S; Yamashita M; Murakami K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 1561063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Method for biomicroscopic study of the conjunctival blood vessels.
    GARTNER S
    Arch Ophthal; 1946 May; 35():519-24. PubMed ID: 20984326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing ocular bulbar redness: a comparison of methods.
    Downie LE; Keller PR; Vingrys AJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Mar; 36(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 26890702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An objective comparison of 35-mm film and digital camera image quality: a new gold standard.
    Hamilton GS
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 19451457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems.
    Musadiq M; Patsoura E; Hughes S; Yang YC
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Jul; 17(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 12855971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Scientific imaging with digital cameras.
    Spring KR
    Biotechniques; 2000 Jul; 29(1):70-2, 74, 76. PubMed ID: 10907079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of retroillumination images of crystalline lenses taken with different camera types.
    Sakamoto Y; Rankov G; Sasaki K
    Ophthalmic Res; 1990; 22 Suppl 1():41-5. PubMed ID: 2388750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Image analysis of conjunctival hyperemia. A personal computer based system.
    Villumsen J; Ringquist J; Alm A
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1991 Aug; 69(4):536-9. PubMed ID: 1750326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.