These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25440107)
1. Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: balancing education with safety. Hopkins MR; Dowdy SC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):444-5. PubMed ID: 25440107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Mohan M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):688. PubMed ID: 25530597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reply: To PMID 24949539. Uppal S; Rose SL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):688. PubMed ID: 25530594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes. Igwe E; Hernandez E; Rose S; Uppal S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):484.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24949539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases. Claerhout F; Deprest J Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 19(3):357-75. PubMed ID: 15985252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: is dissecting the ureter necessary? Lee CL; Soong YK Int Surg; 1995; 80(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 8530236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy? Brown DN Menopause; 2015 Jan; 22(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 25490114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Mendise TJ; Roulette GD; von Gruenigen VE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):593-4. PubMed ID: 23871948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Total hysterectomy for benign pathologies: why is laparoscopy of value?]. Chapron C; Aubert V; Dubuisson JB Contracept Fertil Sex; 1995 Nov; 23(11):688-93. PubMed ID: 8520652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy]. Laatikainen T; Sjöberg J; Mäkinen J; Heinonen PK; Kauko M; Tomás E Duodecim; 1996; 112(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 10590597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Li M; Han Y; Feng YC J Int Med Res; 2012; 40(2):701-8. PubMed ID: 22613433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy. A series of 318 consecutive cases]. Masson FN; Pouly JL; Canis M; Mage G; Wattiez A; Pomel C; Glowaczover E; Bruhat MA J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(4):340-52. PubMed ID: 8815132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In Search for the Best Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approach for the Large Uterus: A Review. Kho RM; Abrão MS Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 60(2):286-295. PubMed ID: 28319474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Paraiso MF; Ridgeway B; Park AJ; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Falcone T; Einarsson JI Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 208(5):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology: comparison between robotic assisted laparoscopy, classic laparoscopy and laparotomy. Saceanu S; Cela V; Surlin V; Angelescu CM; Patrascu S; Georgescu I; Genazzani A Chirurgia (Bucur); 2013; 108(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 23790783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy. Nezhat F; Nezhat C; Gordon S; Wilkins E J Reprod Med; 1992 Mar; 37(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 1532990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]