480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25440325)
1. Utility of 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging to evaluate carotid artery stenosis: comparison with magnetic resonance angiography.
Igase K; Kumon Y; Matsubara I; Arai M; Goishi J; Watanabe H; Ohnishi T; Sadamoto K
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015 Jan; 24(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 25440325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.
Brinjikji W; Huston J; Rabinstein AA; Kim GM; Lerman A; Lanzino G
J Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 124(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 26230478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens.
Netuka D; Ostrý S; Belsán T; Rucka D; Mandys V; Charvát F; Bradác O; Benes V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Plaque Characteristics of Patients with Symptomatic Mild Carotid Artery Stenosis.
Takai H; Uemura J; Yagita Y; Ogawa Y; Kinoshita K; Hirai S; Ishihara M; Hara K; Toi H; Matsubara S; Nishimura H; Uno M
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1930-1936. PubMed ID: 29571763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Extracranial carotid artery disease assessed by contrast enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography: correlation with carotid ultrasonography].
Arai S; Utsunomiya H; Tashiro T; Kuroiwa T; Okazaki M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Oct; 62(12):695-700. PubMed ID: 12462071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of the fusion imaging of 3D-CT and MRA for carotid artery stenting with minimum use of contrast medium in patient with renal dysfunction.
Inoue A; Tagawa M; Kumon Y; Watanabe H; Ohue S; Ohtsuka Y; Nakamura Y; Ohnishi T
Interv Neuroradiol; 2015 Apr; 21(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 25934657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved carotid lumen delineation on non-contrast MR angiography using SNAP (Simultaneous Non-Contrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage) imaging.
Liu H; Sun J; Hippe DS; Wu W; Chu B; Balu N; Hatsukami T; Yuan C
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():87-93. PubMed ID: 31247251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-sectional magnetic resonance angiography is accurate in predicting degree of carotid stenosis.
Morasch MD; Gurjala AN; Washington E; Chiou AC; Simonetti OP; Finn JP; Yao JS
Ann Vasc Surg; 2002 May; 16(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 11957000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vulnerable carotid plaque imaging and histopathology without a dedicated MRI receiver coil.
Fitzpatrick LA; Berkovitz N; Dos Santos MP; Majeed N; Glikstein R; Chakraborty S; Veinot JP; Stotts G; Berthiaume A; Chatelain R
Neuroradiol J; 2017 Apr; 30(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 28071288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of carotid plaque ulcer detection using contrast-enhanced and time-of-flight MRA techniques.
Etesami M; Hoi Y; Steinman DA; Gujar SK; Nidecker AE; Astor BC; Portanova A; Qiao Y; Abdalla WM; Wasserman BA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 22627797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating non-invasive medical imaging for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
Lu X; Zhang W; Gui Q; Yu M; Guo Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jan; 116(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 12667401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gadolinium-enhanced versus time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: what is the benefit of contrast enhancement in evaluating carotid stenosis?
Muhs BE; Gagne P; Wagener J; Baker J; Ortega MR; Adelman MA; Cayne NS; Rockman CB; Maldonado T
Ann Vasc Surg; 2005 Nov; 19(6):823-8. PubMed ID: 16200470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [B-flow and color-coded B-flow in sonographic diagnosis of filiform stenosis of the internal carotid artery].
Jung EM; Clevert DA; Rupp N
Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1251-8. PubMed ID: 12964082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR carotid plaque imaging and contrast-enhanced MR angiography identifies lesions associated with recent ipsilateral thromboembolic symptoms: an in vivo study at 3T.
Demarco JK; Ota H; Underhill HR; Zhu DC; Reeves MJ; Potchen MJ; Majid A; Collar A; Talsma JA; Potru S; Oikawa M; Dong L; Zhao X; Yarnykh VL; Yuan C
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2010 Sep; 31(8):1395-402. PubMed ID: 20651015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Symptomatic Carotid Plaque Using Source Data from MR and CT Angiography: A Correlative Study.
Gupta A; Baradaran H; Mtui EE; Kamel H; Pandya A; Giambrone A; Iadecola C; Sanelli PC
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015; 39(3-4):151-61. PubMed ID: 25721945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional ultrasound observation of carotid artery plaque ulceration.
Schminke U; Motsch L; Hilker L; Kessler C
Stroke; 2000 Jul; 31(7):1651-5. PubMed ID: 10884468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
