BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25440411)

  • 1. Assessment of voice quality: Current state-of-the-art.
    Barsties B; De Bodt M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 25440411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome of resonant voice therapy for female teachers with voice disorders: perceptual, physiological, acoustic, aerodynamic, and functional measurements.
    Chen SH; Hsiao TY; Hsiao LC; Chung YM; Chiang SC
    J Voice; 2007 Jul; 21(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 16581227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech: Is it a reliable tool?
    Suhail IS; Kazi RA; Jagade M
    Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 27146761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality: pros, cons and future directions.
    Oates J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 19204393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality.
    Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 27539001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 1: evaluating vocal function.
    Cohen W; Wynne DM; Kubba H; McCartney E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Apr; 37(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 22149459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of subjective assessment of voice disorders and objective voice measurement.
    Hanschmann H; Lohmann A; Berger R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 20938187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The correlation between subjective and objective voice evaluation in organic and functional larynx disorders].
    Wiskirska-Woźnica B; Pruszewicz A; Obrebowski A; Swidziński P
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2003; 57(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 14587393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impairment of voice quality in paradoxical vocal fold motion dysfunction.
    Yelken K; Gultekin E; Guven M; Eyibilen A; Aladag I
    J Voice; 2010 Nov; 24(6):724-7. PubMed ID: 20097526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Relationship between voice acoustic parameters and vocal quality].
    Huang Z; Wan P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 22(6):251-5. PubMed ID: 18533559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voice assessment: updates on perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods.
    Mehta DD; Hillman RE
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 16(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 18475073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 2: subjective measurement of symptoms of voice disorder.
    Cohen W; Wardrop A; Wynne DM; Kubba H; McCartney E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Apr; 37(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 22149600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Design of standard voice sample text for subjective auditory perceptual evaluation of voice disorders].
    Li JR; Sun YY; Xu W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Sep; 45(9):719-22. PubMed ID: 21092667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.
    Kempster GB; Gerratt BR; Verdolini Abbott K; Barkmeier-Kraemer J; Hillman RE
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2009 May; 18(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 18930908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of extended voice use on the acoustic characteristics of phonation after training and performance of actors from the La MaMa Experimental Theater club.
    Ferrone C; Galgano J; Ramig LO
    J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):e123-37. PubMed ID: 20381306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonetic considerations in the design of voice assessment material.
    Abberton E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2005; 30(3-4):175-80. PubMed ID: 16287659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Voice disorders in children and its relationship with auditory, acoustic and vocal behavior parameters.
    Simões-Zenari M; Nemr K; Behlau M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):896-900. PubMed ID: 22444740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-perception, complaints and vocal quality among undergraduate students enrolled in a Pedagogy course.
    Fabron EM; Regaçone SF; Marino VC; Mastria ML; Motonaga SM; Sebastião LT
    Codas; 2015; 27(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 26222947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occupational voice complaints and objective acoustic measurements-do they correlate?
    Lehto L; Laaksonen L; Vilkman E; Alku P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 17114126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.