These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25440816)
1. Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial. Sener NC; Bas O; Sener E; Zengin K; Ozturk U; Altunkol A; Evliyaoglu Y Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 25440816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm. El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. Pearle MS; Lingeman JE; Leveillee R; Kuo R; Preminger GM; Nadler RB; Macaluso J; Monga M; Kumar U; Dushinski J; Albala DM; Wolf JS; Assimos D; Fabrizio M; Munch LC; Nakada SY; Auge B; Honey J; Ogan K; Pattaras J; McDougall EM; Averch TD; Turk T; Pietrow P; Watkins S J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2005-9. PubMed ID: 15879805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Sener et al.: asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial (Urology 2015;85:33-37). Karatag T; Buldu I; Istanbulluoglu MO Urology; 2015 Mar; 85(3):709. PubMed ID: 25733297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient decision making for asymptomatic renal calculi: balancing benefit and risk. Sarkissian C; Noble M; Li J; Monga M Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 23374767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children. Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi. Salem HK Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. Pearle MS; Lingeman JE; Leveillee R; Kuo R; Preminger GM; Nadler RB; Macaluso J; Monga M; Kumar U; Dushinski J; Albala DM; Wolf JS; Assimos D; Fabrizio M; Munch LC; Nakada SY; Auge B; Honey J; Ogan K; Pattaras J; McDougall EM; Averch TD; Turk T; Pietrow P; Watkins S J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5 Suppl):S69-73. PubMed ID: 18405758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes. Singh BP; Prakash J; Sankhwar SN; Dhakad U; Sankhwar PL; Goel A; Kumar M Urology; 2014 May; 83(5):1016-22. PubMed ID: 24560970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lower pole midsize (1-2 cm) calyceal stones: outcome analysis of 56 cases. Aboutaleb H; El-Shazly M; Badr Eldin M Urol Int; 2012; 89(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 22922771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones. Kartal I; Baylan B; Çakıcı MÇ; Sarı S; Selmi V; Ozdemir H; Yalçınkaya F Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Apr; 92(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 32255321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic. Bai S; Zhan Y; Pan C; Liu G; Li J; Shan L Urolithiasis; 2023 Feb; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 36795174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi. Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones. Chung VY; Turney BW Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 26743071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Chiong E; Hwee ST; Kay LM; Liang S; Kamaraj R; Esuvaranathan K Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1070-4. PubMed ID: 15922429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Preminger GM Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No Wound for Stones <2 cm in Horseshoe Kidney: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies. Chen H; Chen G; Pan Y; Zhu Y; Xiong C; Chen H; Yang Z Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):249-255. PubMed ID: 31096234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm. Sener NC; Imamoglu MA; Bas O; Ozturk U; Goktug HN; Tuygun C; Bakirtas H Urolithiasis; 2014 Apr; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 24220692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective, randomized trial of management for asymptomatic lower pole calculi. Yuruk E; Binbay M; Sari E; Akman T; Altinyay E; Baykal M; Muslumanoglu AY; Tefekli A J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1424-8. PubMed ID: 20172565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]