361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25440820)
1. Supine transgluteal vs prone position in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteric stones.
Kamel M; Salem EA; Maarouf A; Abdalla M; Ragab A; Shahin AM
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 25440820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates.
Phipps S; Stephenson C; Tolley D
BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(2):E129-33. PubMed ID: 23360696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The transgluteal approach to shockwave lithotripsy to treat distal ureter stones: a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study.
Choo MS; Han JH; Kim JK; Shin TY; Lee WK; Lee SK; Lee SH
World J Urol; 2018 Aug; 36(8):1299-1306. PubMed ID: 29549483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages of the supine transgluteal approach for distal ureteral stone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: outcomes based on CT characteristics.
Galli R; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Martorana E; Rosa M; Mofferdin A; Bianchi G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Apr; 69(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 27768022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supine versus Prone Position during Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treating Distal Ureteral Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Li T; Gao L; Chen P; Bu S; Cao D; Yang L; Wei Q
Urol Int; 2016; 97(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26352560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with patients rotated supine or rotated prone for treating ureteral stones: a case-control study.
Hara N; Koike H; Bilim V; Takahashi K; Nishiyama T
J Endourol; 2006 Mar; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16548722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supine or prone.
Istanbulluoglu MO; Hoscan MB; Tekin MI; Cicek T; Ozturk B; Ozkardes H
Urol Res; 2011 Jun; 39(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 20963407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple position to provide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar.
Tansu N; Obek C; Onal B; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V
Eur Urol; 2004 Mar; 45(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 15036682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effect of body position, prone or supine, on the result of extracorpreal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with stones in the proximal ureter.
Zomorrodi A; Elahian A; Ghorbani N; Tavoosi A
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2007 Jun; 18(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 17496395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sciaticum majus foramen and sciaticum minus foramen as the path of SWL in the supine position to treat distal ureteral stone.
Lu J; Sun X; He L
Urol Res; 2010 Dec; 38(6):417-20. PubMed ID: 20625895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: which is the ideal approach?
Soliman MG; Gameel T; El-Tatawy H; El-Abd AS
Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Dec; 52(12):2269-2274. PubMed ID: 32683658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the Prone Position During the Shockwave Lithotripsy of Kidney Stones Improve the Stone-Free Rate? Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Mohammadi A; Oliveira Reis L; Khajavi A; Zareian Baghdadabad L; Aghamir SMK
Urol J; 2023 May; 20(3):136-143. PubMed ID: 36695211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi.
Stewart GD; Bariol SV; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
Int J Clin Pract; 2007 May; 61(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 17386062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Treatment of ureteral calculi: report of 152 calculi].
Lamotte F; Izadifar V; Fontaine E; Barthélémy Y; Beurton D
Prog Urol; 2000 Feb; 10(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10785914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.
Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC
J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.
De Sio M; Autorino R; Quarto G; Mordente S; Giugliano F; Di Giacomo F; Neri F; Quattrone C; Sorrentino D; De Domenico R; D'Armiento M
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 17550410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
