These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25441065)

  • 1. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement.
    Borger MA; Moustafine V; Conradi L; Knosalla C; Richter M; Merk DR; Doenst T; Hammerschmidt R; Treede H; Dohmen P; Strauch JT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 99(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25441065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Haemodynamic benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: 1-year results of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.
    Borger MA; Dohmen PM; Knosalla C; Hammerschmidt R; Merk DR; Richter M; Doenst T; Conradi L; Treede H; Moustafine V; Holzhey DM; Duhay F; Strauch J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Oct; 50(4):713-720. PubMed ID: 26935407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Versus Its Conventional Counterpart: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Wahlers TCW; Andreas M; Rahmanian P; Candolfi P; Zemanova B; Giot C; Ferrari E; Laufer G
    Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 29912142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Excellent Results and Increased Effective Orifice Areas.
    Rahmanian PB; Kaya S; Eghbalzadeh K; Menghesha H; Madershahian N; Wahlers T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jan; 105(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 29132703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The economic value of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via full sternotomy.
    Moore M; Barnhart GR; Chitwood WR; Rizzo JA; Gunnarsson C; Palli SR; Grossi EA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Jun; 6(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 28374618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TRANSFORM (Multicenter Experience With Rapid Deployment Edwards INTUITY Valve System for Aortic Valve Replacement) US clinical trial: Performance of a rapid deployment aortic valve.
    Barnhart GR; Accola KD; Grossi EA; Woo YJ; Mumtaz MA; Sabik JF; Slachman FN; Patel HJ; Borger MA; Garrett HE; Rodriguez E; McCarthy PM; Ryan WH; Duhay FG; Mack MJ; Chitwood WR;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Feb; 153(2):241-251.e2. PubMed ID: 27817951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Northern New England Rapid Deployment Valve Experience: Survival and Procedural Outcomes From 2015 to 2021.
    Fallon JM; Malenka DJ; Ross CS; Ramkumar N; Seshasayee SM; Westbrook BM; Hirashima F; Quinn RD
    Innovations (Phila); 2024; 19(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 38318656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.
    Kocher AA; Laufer G; Haverich A; Shrestha M; Walther T; Misfeld M; Kempfert J; Gillam L; Schmitz C; Wahlers TC; Wippermann J; Mohr FW; Roth M; Skwara A; Rahmanian P; Wiedemann D; Borger MA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Jan; 145(1):110-5; discussion 115-6. PubMed ID: 23058665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
    Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison.
    Merk DR; Lehmann S; Holzhey DM; Dohmen P; Candolfi P; Misfeld M; Mohr FW; Borger MA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 47(1):11-7; discussion 17. PubMed ID: 24599160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early Outcomes with Rapid-deployment vs Stented Biological Valves: A Propensity-match Analysis.
    Nguyen A; Stevens LM; Bouchard D; Demers P; Perrault LP; Carrier M
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018; 30(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 29031706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
    Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early-Term Results of Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement versus Standard Bioprosthesis Implantation Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Taghiyev ZT; Bechtel M; Schlömicher M; Useini D; Taghi HN; Moustafine V; Strauch JT
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Oct; 71(7):519-527. PubMed ID: 35151232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic valve replacement via right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy: a propensity score analysis.
    Glower DD; Desai BS; Hughes GC; Milano CA; Gaca JG
    Innovations (Phila); 2014; 9(2):75-81; discussion 81. PubMed ID: 24758951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally Invasive vs Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement With Rapid-Deployment Bioprostheses.
    D'Onofrio A; Tessari C; Lorenzoni G; Cibin G; Martinelli G; Alamanni F; Polvani G; Solinas M; Massetti M; Merlo M; Vendramin I; Di Eusanio M; Mignosa C; Mangino D; Russo C; Rinaldi M; Pacini D; Salvador L; Antona C; Maselli D; De Paulis R; Luzi G; Alfieri O; De Filippo CM; Portoghese M; Musumeci F; Colli A; Gregori D; Gerosa G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Jun; 111(6):1916-1922. PubMed ID: 33039363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid-Deployment Versus Conventional Bio-Prosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Smith AL; Shi WY; Rosalion A; Yii M; O'Keefe M; Newcomb AE; Davis P
    Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Feb; 26(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 27523460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do rapid deployment aortic valves improve outcomes compared with surgical aortic valve replacement?
    Davies RA; Bandara TD; Perera NK; Orr Y
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Nov; 23(5):814-820. PubMed ID: 27371610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sutureless Valve Implantation via Mini J-Sternotomy: A Single Center Experience with 2 Years Mean Follow-up.
    Fischlein T; Pfeiffer S; Pollari F; Sirch J; Vogt F; Santarpino G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 26177222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.