These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25441325)

  • 1. Public engagement in priority-setting: results from a pan-Canadian survey of decision-makers in cancer control.
    Regier DA; Bentley C; Mitton C; Bryan S; Burgess MM; Chesney E; Coldman A; Gibson J; Hoch J; Rahman S; Sabharwal M; Sawka C; Schuckel V; Peacock SJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Dec; 122():130-9. PubMed ID: 25441325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy.
    Bentley C; Peacock S; Abelson J; Burgess MM; Demers-Payette O; Longstaff H; Tripp L; Lavis JN; Wilson MG
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 30732616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The No-Destination Ship of Priority-Setting in Healthcare: A Call for More Democracy.
    Seixas BV
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):345-348. PubMed ID: 29626402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public perspectives on disinvestments in drug funding: results from a Canadian deliberative public engagement event on cancer drugs.
    Costa S; Bentley C; Regier DA; McTaggart-Cowan H; Mitton C; Burgess MM; Peacock SJ
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):977. PubMed ID: 31331312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence, values, and funding decisions in Canadian cancer systems.
    Peacock SJ; Regier DA; Raymakers AJN; Chan KKW
    Healthc Manage Forum; 2019 Nov; 32(6):293-298. PubMed ID: 31645144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework for involving the public in health care coverage and resource allocation decisions.
    Chafe R; Neville D; Rathwell T; Deber R
    Healthc Manage Forum; 2008; 21(4):6-21. PubMed ID: 19363962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpreting public input into priority-setting: the role of mediating institutions.
    Tenbensel T
    Health Policy; 2002 Nov; 62(2):173-94. PubMed ID: 12354411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.
    Jessani NS; Siddiqi SM; Babcock C; Davey-Rothwell M; Ho S; Holtgrave DR
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jul; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 30045730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey.
    Polisena J; Burgess M; Mitton C; Lynd LD
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 May; 17(1):372. PubMed ID: 28549479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The setting of healthcare priorities through public engagement.
    Meetoo D
    Br J Nurs; 2013 Apr 11-24; 22(7):372-6. PubMed ID: 23588012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
    Mitton C; Smith N; Peacock S; Evoy B; Abelson J
    Health Policy; 2009 Aug; 91(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 19261347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes towards priority-setting and rationing in healthcare -- an exploratory survey of Swedish medical students.
    Omar F; Tinghög G; Tinghög P; Carlsson P
    Scand J Public Health; 2009 Mar; 37(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 19141543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Stakeholder participation in priority setting - a consideration of the normative status of quantitative and qualitative methods].
    Friedrich DR; Stumpf S; Alber K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):412-7. PubMed ID: 22857728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fit for purpose? Introducing a rational priority setting approach into a community care setting.
    Cornelissen E; Mitton C; Davidson A; Reid C; Hole R; Visockas AM; Smith N
    J Health Organ Manag; 2016 Jun; 30(4):690-710. PubMed ID: 27296887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study.
    Singer PA; Martin DK; Giacomini M; Purdy L
    BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1316-8. PubMed ID: 11090513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework.
    Maluka S; Kamuzora P; San Sebastiån M; Byskov J; Olsen ØE; Shayo E; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Aug; 71(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 20554365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Democratic institutional design in health care priority setting and rationing].
    Landwehr C
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 22857727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.
    Wiseman V; Mooney G; Berry G; Tang KC
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 56(5):1001-12. PubMed ID: 12593873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: a survey of key decision makers.
    Mitton C; Donaldson C
    Health Policy; 2002 Apr; 60(1):39-58. PubMed ID: 11879944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Priority setting and the ethics of resource allocation within VA healthcare facilities: results of a survey.
    Foglia MB; Pearlman RA; Bottrell MM; Altemose JA; Fox E
    Organ Ethic; 2008; 4(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 18839751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.