195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25441730)
1. Low risk of pelvic sepsis after intersphincteric proctectomy in patients with low rectal cancer.
Eriksen MH; Maina P; Jensen KH
Dan Med J; 2014 Dec; 61(12):A4972. PubMed ID: 25441730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low Hartmann's procedure or intersphincteric proctectomy for distal rectal cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
Westerduin E; Musters GD; van Geloven AAW; Westerterp M; van der Harst E; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1583-1589. PubMed ID: 28801697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hartmann's procedure vs abdominoperineal resection with intersphincteric dissection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized multicentre trial (HAPIrect).
Smedh K; Sverrisson I; Chabok A; Nikberg M;
BMC Surg; 2016 Jul; 16(1):43. PubMed ID: 27401339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid-Rectal Cancer Without Anastomosis: Low Hartmann's Operation or Intersphincteric Abdomino-Perineal Excision?
Popiolek M; Dehlaghi K; Gadan S; Baban B; Matthiessen P
Scand J Surg; 2019 Sep; 108(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 30474501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pelvic sepsis after extended Hartmann's procedure.
Tøttrup A; Frost L
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Feb; 48(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 15714249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of BMI on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing proctectomy for rectal cancer: a national surgical quality improvement program analysis.
Smith RK; Broach RB; Hedrick TL; Mahmoud NN; Paulson EC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jun; 57(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 24807592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hartmann's procedure in rectal cancer: a population-based study of postoperative complications.
Sverrisson I; Nikberg M; Chabok A; Smedh K
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Feb; 30(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 25421100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What to do with the rectal stump during sphincter preserving rectal cancer resection with end colostomy: a collaborative snapshot study.
Westerduin E; Aukema TS; van Geloven AAW; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ;
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug; 20(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 29573105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A meta-analysis of low Hartmann's procedure versus abdominoperineal resection for non-restorative treatment of rectal cancer.
Ahmad NZ; Azam M; Coffey JC
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 36(12):2585-2598. PubMed ID: 34272997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
Selvindos PB; Ho YH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low Hartmann's procedure or intersphincteric abdominoperineal resection in the primary treatment of low rectal cancer; a survey among surgeons evaluating current practice.
Westerduin E; Westerterp M; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ; van Geloven AA
Acta Chir Belg; 2019 Apr; 119(2):132-136. PubMed ID: 30332334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach.
Laurent C; Paumet T; Leblanc F; Denost Q; Rullier E
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jan; 14(1):35-41; discussion 42-3. PubMed ID: 21114752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hartmann's procedure vs. abdominoperineal resection for palliation of advanced low rectal cancer.
Heah SM; Eu KW; Ho YH; Leong AF; Seow-Choen F
Dis Colon Rectum; 1997 Nov; 40(11):1313-7. PubMed ID: 9369105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma.
Nurkin S; Kakarla VR; Ruiz DE; Cance WG; Tiszenkel HI
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e309-16. PubMed ID: 23586660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a low Hartmann's procedure with low colorectal anastomosis with and without defunctioning ileostomy after radiotherapy for rectal cancer: results from a national registry.
Jonker FH; Tanis PJ; Coene PP; Gietelink L; van der Harst E;
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Aug; 18(8):785-92. PubMed ID: 26788679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Short-term results of sphincter-preserving operation with intersphincteric resection in low rectal cancer].
Wang ZJ; Wei GH
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 45(17):1173-5. PubMed ID: 18067709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preservation of the continence function after intersphincteric resection using a prolapsing technique in the patients with low rectal cancer and its clinical prognosis.
Dai Y; Jiang JB; Bi DS; Jin ZT; Sun JZ; Hu SY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Oct; 121(20):2016-20. PubMed ID: 19080267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
Denost Q; Laurent C; Capdepont M; Zerbib F; Rullier E
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Aug; 54(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 21730784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
