These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25441847)
1. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire. Kim JB; Kim JK; Seo SG; Lee DY J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 25441847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS). Cöster MC; Rosengren BE; Bremander A; Brudin L; Karlsson MK Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1031-6. PubMed ID: 25015390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Lee KM; Chung CY; Kwon SS; Sung KH; Lee SY; Won SH; Lee DJ; Lee SC; Park MS Clin Rheumatol; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1443-50. PubMed ID: 23703359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Foot Function Index. Huh JW; Eun IS; Ko YC; Park MJ; Hwang KM; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(4):759-61. PubMed ID: 27067199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Korean Version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire in Patients With Hallux Valgus. Park MJ; Ko YC; Huh JW; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):252-254. PubMed ID: 28231961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. Kim JK; Kang JS J Hand Ther; 2013; 26(3):238-43; quiz 244. PubMed ID: 23453368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle. Angthong C Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcultural adaptation and validation of a Korean version of the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for children. Cho SH; Chung CY; Park MS; Lee KM; Sung KH Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 May; 18(1):118. PubMed ID: 32357937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spanish Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire in Mexican-Americans With Traumatic Foot and Ankle Injuries. Zelle BA; Francisco BS; Bossmann JP; Fajardo RJ; Bhandari M J Orthop Trauma; 2017 May; 31(5):e158-e162. PubMed ID: 28166169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Mazaheri M; Salavati M; Negahban H; Sohani SM; Taghizadeh F; Feizi A; Karimi A; Parnianpour M Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2010 Jun; 18(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 20338253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. Ibrahim T; Beiri A; Azzabi M; Best AJ; Taylor GJ; Menon DK J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 17331864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Korean version of the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Cross cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Kim JK; Lim HM J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2015 Feb; 40(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 25005562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 17-Italian Foot Function Index with numerical rating scale: development, reliability, and validity of a modified version of the original Foot Function Index. Venditto T; Tognolo L; Rizzo RS; Iannuccelli C; Di Sante L; Trevisan M; Maggiolini FR; Santilli V; Ioppolo F Foot (Edinb); 2015 Mar; 25(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 25641642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Persian version of Shoulder Activity Scale in a group of patients with shoulder disorders. Negahban H; Mohtasebi E; Goharpey S Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(19):1777-82. PubMed ID: 25382216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle: The Turkish Version. Gur G; Turgut E; Dilek B; Baltaci G; Bek N; Yakut Y J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(6):1213-1217. PubMed ID: 28864388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale: A cross-cultural adaptation and validation study from Iran. Vosoughi AR; Roustaei N; Mahdaviazad H Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Jun; 24(3):219-223. PubMed ID: 29409212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcultural adaptation and testing of psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Lee YK; Chung CY; Koo KH; Lee KM; Lee DJ; Lee SC; Park MS Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2011 Jul; 19(7):853-7. PubMed ID: 21352935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Foot and Ankle Disability Index. Eun IS; Oh YS; Kim J; Jang W J Foot Ankle Surg; 2024; 63(1):33-35. PubMed ID: 37604317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C Foot (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 21(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 21602039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; translation and validation of the Dutch language version for ankle fractures. de Boer AS; Tjioe RJC; Van der Sijde F; Meuffels DE; den Hoed PT; Van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; Verhofstad MHJ; Van Lieshout EMM; BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017040. PubMed ID: 28775193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]