These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25441868)
1. Accuracy assessment of a marker-free method for registration of CT and stereo images applied in image-guided implantology: a phantom study. Mohagheghi S; Ahmadian A; Yaghoobee S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 25441868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A region-based anatomical landmark configuration for sinus surgery using image guided navigation system: a phantom-study. Ahmadian A; Fathi Kazerooni A; Mohagheghi S; Amini Khoiy K; Sadr Hosseini M J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 24461706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the accuracy of invasive and noninvasive registration methods for image-guided oral implant surgery. Widmann G; Stoffner R; Schullian P; Widmann R; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Puelacher W; Bale RJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 20556247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fiducial optimization for minimal target registration error in image-guided neurosurgery. Shamir RR; Joskowicz L; Shoshan Y IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Mar; 31(3):725-37. PubMed ID: 22156977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimization of target registration error for vertebra in image-guided spine surgery. Ershad M; Ahmadian A; Dadashi Serej N; Saberi H; Amini Khoiy K Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Jan; 9(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 23820761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomical landmarks for point-matching registration in image-guided neurosurgery. Omara AI; Wang M; Fan Y; Song Z Int J Med Robot; 2014 Mar; 10(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 23733606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: an in-vitro study. Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Schepers S; Vrielinck L; Lambrichts I; Politis C J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 41(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 23273492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A hybrid method to improve target registration accuracy in surgical navigation. Jeon S; Park J; Chien J; Hong J Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015; 24(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 25761496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: a comparison study of three patient-to-image registration methods. Woerdeman PA; Willems PW; Noordmans HJ; Tulleken CA; van der Sprenkel JW J Neurosurg; 2007 Jun; 106(6):1012-6. PubMed ID: 17564173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fiducial markers configuration optimization in image-guided surgery. Bao N; Chen Y; Yue Y; Li H; Cui Z; Zhuang J; Tian S; Kang Y Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3361-71. PubMed ID: 25227046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study. Fan S; Hung K; Bornstein MM; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):85–90. PubMed ID: 30521651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The validity of marker registration for an optimal integration method in mandibular navigation surgery. Kang SH; Kim MK; Kim JH; Park HK; Lee SH; Park W J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 22695020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of fiducial configuration on target registration error in image-guided cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Zhang W; Wang C; Yu H; Liu Y; Shen G J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 39(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 21067938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of two dental registration-splint techniques for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Venosta D; Sun Y; Matthews F; Kruse AL; Lanzer M; Gander T; Grätz KW; Lübbers HT J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 23835568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Novel Noninvasive Patient-Specific Navigation Method for Orbital Reconstructive Surgery: A Phantom Study Using Patient Data. Lee J; Mekuria K; Son TG; Jeong WS; Choi JW; Kim Y Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Mar; 143(3):602e-612e. PubMed ID: 30601235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Birkfellner W; Solar P; Gahleitner A; Huber K; Kainberger F; Kettenbach J; Homolka P; Diemling M; Watzek G; Bergmann H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 11168273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An advanced navigational surgery system for dental implants completed in a single visit: an in vitro study. Kim SG; Lee WJ; Lee SS; Heo MS; Huh KH; Choi SC; Kim TI; Yi WJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 25434287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative fiducial-less patient registration using volumetric 3D ultrasound: a prospective series of 32 neurosurgical cases. Fan X; Roberts DW; Ji S; Hartov A; Paulsen KD J Neurosurg; 2015 Sep; 123(3):721-31. PubMed ID: 26140481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new markerless patient-to-image registration method using a portable 3D scanner. Fan Y; Jiang D; Wang M; Song Z Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101910. PubMed ID: 25281962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study. Hoffmann J; Westendorff C; Schneider M; Reinert S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15973949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]