These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25442994)

  • 1. Pathologic evaluation of 28 Mitroflow pericardial valves: a 12-year experience.
    Luk A; Cusimano RJ; Butany J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 99(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 25442994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modes of failure in explanted mitroflow pericardial valves.
    Butany J; Feng T; Luk A; Law K; Suri R; Nair V
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Nov; 92(5):1621-7. PubMed ID: 21944438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: structured failure at 4.5 years.
    Butany J; Feng T; Suri R; Law K; Christakis G
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2012; 21(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 23137773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mitroflow pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors.
    Minami K; Boethig D; Mirow N; Kleikamp G; Koertke H; Godehardt E; Koerfer R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 10678383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients? Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration of allograft and pericardial prostheses.
    Smedira NG; Blackstone EH; Roselli EE; Laffey CC; Cosgrove DM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 131(3):558-564.e4. PubMed ID: 16515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early calcification of the aortic Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly.
    Alvarez JR; Sierra J; Vega M; Adrio B; Martinez-Comendador J; Gude F; Martinez-Cereijo J; Garcia J
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Nov; 9(5):842-6. PubMed ID: 19679611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Surgical pathology analysis of the causes of failure of 48 bioprosthetic heart valves in 40 Chinese cases].
    Duan XJ; Wang HY; Xu JP; Li L; Xu HY; Wang QZ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 54(9):710-5. PubMed ID: 27587216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphological findings in explanted Toronto stentless porcine valves.
    Butany J; Collins MJ; Nair V; Leask RL; Scully HE; Williams WG; David TE
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2006; 15(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16414456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term outcome of the MitroFlow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly after aortic valve replacement.
    Sjögren J; Gudbjartsson T; Thulin LI
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Mar; 15(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 16607900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis--clinical performance.
    Jamieson WR; Koerfer R; Yankah CA; Zittermann A; Hayden RI; Ling H; Hetzer R; Dolman WB
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Nov; 36(5):818-24. PubMed ID: 19700338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis.
    García-Bengochea J; Sierra J; González-Juanatey JR; Rubio J; Vega M; Fernández AL; Sánchez D
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):446-51; discussion 451-2. PubMed ID: 16784087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mode of failure of the Mitroflow pericardial valve.
    Leandri J; Bertrand P; Mazzucotelli JP; Loisance D
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Nov; 1(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 1341633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lack of durability of the Mitroflow valve does not affect survival.
    Houel R; Le Besnerais P; Soustelle C; Kirsch M; Hillion ML; Loisance D
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jul; 8(4):368-74; discussion 374-5. PubMed ID: 10461235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seventeen-year clinical results of 1,037 Mitroflow pericardial heart valve prostheses in the aortic position.
    Yankah CA; Schubel J; Buz S; Siniawski H; Hetzer R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Mar; 14(2):172-9; discussion 179-80. PubMed ID: 15792176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early outcomes of pulmonary valve replacement with the mitroflow bovine pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Schubert SA; Myers JL; Kunselman AR; Clark JB
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 May; 99(5):1692-8; discussion 1698-9. PubMed ID: 25818568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathologic findings in explanted clinical bioprosthetic valves fabricated from photooxidized bovine pericardium.
    Schoen FJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9587858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural deterioration of the Freestyle aortic valve: mode of presentation and mechanisms.
    Mohammadi S; Baillot R; Voisine P; Mathieu P; Dagenais F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 16872969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Wu Y; Wang L; Starr A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Mitroflow pericardial valve: clinical performance to 10 years.
    Mazzucotelli JP; Bertrand PC; Loisance DY
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 7582152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.