These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25443269)

  • 1. Using imaging biomarkers to improve the planning of radical prostatectomies.
    Faure Walker NA; Nir D; Simmons L; Agrawal S; Chung C; Leminski A; Rashid T; Shamsuddin A; Winkler M
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Jan; 33(1):17.e19-17.e25. PubMed ID: 25443269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database.
    Vesey SG; McCabe JE; Hounsome L; Fowler S
    BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21771246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
    Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
    BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
    Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy.
    Suh YS; Jang HJ; Song W; Lee HW; Kim HS; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
    Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):802-7. PubMed ID: 25512814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Evans SM; Millar JL; Frydenberg M; Murphy DG; Davis ID; Spelman T; Bolton DM; Giles GG; Dean J; Costello AJ; Frauman AG; Kearns PA; Day L; Daniels C; McNeill JJ
    BJU Int; 2014 Nov; 114(5):680-90. PubMed ID: 24128010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discordance between location of positive cores in biopsy and location of positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy.
    Kim JW; Park HK; Kim HG; Ham DY; Paick SH; Lho YS; Choi WS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):710-6. PubMed ID: 26495072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lowering positive margin rates at radical prostatectomy by color coding of biopsy specimens to permit individualized preservation of the neurovascular bundles: is it feasible? a pilot investigation.
    Deane LA; Tan WP; Strong A; Lowe M; Antoine N; Ghai R; Ekbal S
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(6):1081-1088. PubMed ID: 30044594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of prior TURP on radical prostatectomy surgical margins: a multicenter analysis.
    Gacci M; Simonato A; Lanciotti M; Ennas M; Varca V; Maffezzini M; Imbimbo C; Gontero P; Schiavina R; Carini M; Martorana G; Nicita G; Mirone V; Carmignani G
    Urol Int; 2013; 91(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23735440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
    Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
    Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
    Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
    Saether T; Sørlien LT; Viset T; Lydersen S; Angelsen A
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: Does the surgeon's experience have an influence on all pathological stages?
    Villamil AW; Costabel JI; Billordo Peres N; Martínez PF; Giudice CR; Damia OH
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Mar; 38(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 24119633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
    von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
    Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
    Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.