98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25443623)
1. Correlation between biogas yield and chemical composition of energy crops.
Dandikas V; Heuwinkel H; Lichti F; Drewes JE; Koch K
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Dec; 174():316-20. PubMed ID: 25443623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biogas crops grown in energy crop rotations: Linking chemical composition and methane production characteristics.
Herrmann C; Idler C; Heiermann M
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Apr; 206():23-35. PubMed ID: 26836846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of energy crops alternative to maize for biogas production in the Greater Region.
Mayer F; Gerin PA; Noo A; Lemaigre S; Stilmant D; Schmit T; Leclech N; Ruelle L; Gennen J; von Francken-Welz H; Foucart G; Flammang J; Weyland M; Delfosse P
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 166():358-67. PubMed ID: 24929279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Key factors influencing the potential of catch crops for methane production.
Molinuevo-Salces B; Fernández-Varela R; Uellendahl H
Environ Technol; 2014 Aug; 35(13-16):1685-94. PubMed ID: 24956759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits of supplementing an industrial waste anaerobic digester with energy crops for increased biogas production.
Nges IA; Escobar F; Fu X; Björnsson L
Waste Manag; 2012 Jan; 32(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21975301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of ensiling, silage additives and storage period on methane formation of biogas crops.
Herrmann C; Heiermann M; Idler C
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(8):5153-61. PubMed ID: 21334882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the effects of electroporation pre-treatment on the biogas yield from ley crop silage.
Lindmark J; Lagerkvist A; Nilsson E; Carlsson M; Thorin E; Dahlquist E
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2014 Dec; 174(7):2616-25. PubMed ID: 25209554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations.
Amon T; Amon B; Kryvoruchko V; Machmüller A; Hopfner-Sixt K; Bodiroza V; Hrbek R; Friedel J; Pötsch E; Wagentristl H; Schreiner M; Zollitsch W
Bioresour Technol; 2007 Dec; 98(17):3204-12. PubMed ID: 16935493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of herbal-extraction residues with swine manure.
Li Y; Yan XL; Fan JP; Zhu JH; Zhou WB
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jun; 102(11):6458-63. PubMed ID: 21507630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biogas from energy crops--optimal pre-treatments and storage, co-digestion and energy balance in boreal conditions.
Seppälä M; Paavola T; Lehtomäki A; Pakarinen O; Rintala J
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(9):1857-63. PubMed ID: 19029729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regression models of ultimate methane yields of fruits and vegetable solid wastes, sorghum and napiergrass on chemical composition.
Gunaseelan VN
Bioresour Technol; 2007 Apr; 98(6):1270-7. PubMed ID: 16815010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energetic conversion of European semi-natural grassland silages through the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass: energy yields and the fate of organic compounds.
Hensgen F; Bühle L; Donnison I; Heinsoo K; Wachendorf M
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Feb; 154():192-200. PubMed ID: 24393744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anaerobic biogas formation from crops' agricultural residues - Modeling investigations.
Scherzinger M; Kaltschmitt M; Elbanhawy AY
Bioresour Technol; 2022 Sep; 359():127497. PubMed ID: 35752257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid estimation of the biochemical methane potential of plant biomasses using Fourier transform mid-infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy.
Bekiaris G; Triolo JM; Peltre C; Pedersen L; Jensen LS; Bruun S
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Dec; 197():475-81. PubMed ID: 26369276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Production costs and operative margins in electric energy generation from biogas. Full-scale case studies in Italy.
Riva C; Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F
Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1429-35. PubMed ID: 24841069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure and biogas crops in full scale German biogas plants: a model for calculating the effect of hydraulic retention time and VS crop proportion in the mixture on methane yield from digester and from digestate storage at different temperatures.
Linke B; Muha I; Wittum G; Plogsties V
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Feb; 130():689-95. PubMed ID: 23334028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anaerobic digestion of high-yielding tropical energy crops for biomethane production: Effects of crop types, locations and plant parts.
Surendra KC; Ogoshi R; Reinhardt-Hanisch A; Oechsner H; Zaleski HM; Hashimoto AG; Khanal SK
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Aug; 262():194-202. PubMed ID: 29705611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards molecular biomarkers for biogas production from lignocellulose-rich substrates.
Lebuhn M; Hanreich A; Klocke M; Schlüter A; Bauer C; Pérez CM
Anaerobe; 2014 Oct; 29():10-21. PubMed ID: 24785351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Addressing case specific biogas plant tasks: industry oriented methane yields derived from 5L Automatic Methane Potential Test Systems in batch or semi-continuous tests using realistic inocula, substrate particle sizes and organic loading.
Kolbl S; Paloczi A; Panjan J; Stres B
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Feb; 153():180-8. PubMed ID: 24368269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste.
El-Mashad HM; Zhang R
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jun; 101(11):4021-8. PubMed ID: 20137909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
