These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25443869)

  • 1. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts--success and cost analysis.
    Lethaus B; Bloebaum M; Koper D; Poort-Ter Laak M; Kessler P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1948-51. PubMed ID: 25443869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-specific implants compared with stored bone grafts for patients with interval cranioplasty.
    Lethaus B; Bloebaum M; Essers B; ter Laak MP; Steiner T; Kessler P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):206-9. PubMed ID: 24406579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyzing the Cost of Autogenous Cranioplasty Versus Custom-Made Patient-Specific Alloplastic Cranioplasty.
    Mrad MA; Murrad K; Antonyshyn O
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):1260-1263. PubMed ID: 28582300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model.
    Lethaus B; Safi Y; ter Laak-Poort M; Kloss-Brandstätter A; Banki F; Robbenmenke C; Steinseifer U; Kessler P
    J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr; 29(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 22017579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty.
    O'Reilly EB; Barnett S; Madden C; Welch B; Mickey B; Rozen S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Mar; 68(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 25541423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison and cost analysis of cranioplasty techniques: autologous bone versus custom computer-generated implants.
    Gilardino MS; Karunanayake M; Al-Humsi T; Izadpanah A; Al-Ajmi H; Marcoux J; Atkinson J; Farmer JP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 25534061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
    Thien A; King NK; Ang BT; Wang E; Ng I
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary and secondary reconstruction of complex craniofacial defects using polyetheretherketone custom-made implants.
    Gerbino G; Zavattero E; Zenga F; Bianchi FA; Garzino-Demo P; Berrone S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26242698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?
    Ng ZY; Nawaz I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):e55-8. PubMed ID: 24406603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
    Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cryopreservation of Autologous Cranial Bone Flaps for Cranioplasty: A Large Sample Retrospective Study.
    Fan MC; Wang QL; Sun P; Zhan SH; Guo P; Deng WS; Dong Q
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 109():e853-e859. PubMed ID: 29107719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autologous Bone Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Frozen and Subcutaneous Bone Flap Storage Methods.
    Rosinski CL; Chaker AN; Zakrzewski J; Geever B; Patel S; Chiu RG; Rosenberg DM; Parola R; Shah K; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():e312-e320. PubMed ID: 31351936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Punchak M; Chung LK; Lagman C; Bui TT; Lazareff J; Rezzadeh K; Jarrahy R; Yang I
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():30-35. PubMed ID: 28377284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study].
    Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Late Reconstruction of the Orbit With Patient-Specific Implants Using Computer-Aided Planning and Navigation.
    Baumann A; Sinko K; Dorner G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12 Suppl):S101-6. PubMed ID: 26608137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants.
    Jonkergouw J; van de Vijfeijken SE; Nout E; Theys T; Van de Casteele E; Folkersma H; Depauw PR; Becking AG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1266-72. PubMed ID: 27524384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
    Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants polyether ether ketone with computer-assisted planning.
    Manrique OJ; Lalezarzadeh F; Dayan E; Shin J; Buchbinder D; Smith M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May; 26(3):663-6. PubMed ID: 25974770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review.
    Abu-Ghname A; Banuelos J; Oliver JD; Vyas K; Daniels D; Sharaf B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):433e-443e. PubMed ID: 31461029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a therapeutic role for cranioplasty?
    Alibhai MK; Balasundaram I; Bridle C; Holmes SB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 42(5):559-61. PubMed ID: 23415243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.