These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25443880)

  • 1. Effect of attachment types and number of implants supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: a computed tomography-based 3D finite element analysis.
    Arat Bilhan S; Baykasoglu C; Bilhan H; Kutay O; Mugan A
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 25443880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of the attachment type and implant number supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: an in vitro study, part I.
    Arat Bilhan S; Bilhan H; Bozdag E; Sunbuloglu E; Baykasoglu C; Kutay O
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 23296030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
    Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of Implant Inclination on Stress Distribution in Mandibular Overdentures.
    Ebadian B; Mosharraf R; Khodaeian N
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 23574403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
    Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
    Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of stress distribution and flexion among various designs of bar attachments for implant overdentures: a three dimensional finite element analysis.
    Prakash V; D'Souza M; Adhikari R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 19336857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis.
    Chang SH; Huang SR; Huang SF; Lin CL
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(8):911-21. PubMed ID: 26212887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress distribution of one-piece and two-piece mini-Implant overdentures with various attachment systems and diameters: A finite element analysis.
    Trang BNH; Kanazawa M; Murakami N; Wakabayashi N; Hada T; Sahaprom N; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 36372437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.