These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25444300)
21. Classifying recommendations for clinical practice guidelines. American Academy of Pediatrics Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management Pediatrics; 2004 Sep; 114(3):874-7. PubMed ID: 15342869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Methodology for development of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma guideline 2008 update. Brozek JL; Baena-Cagnani CE; Bonini S; Canonica GW; Rasi G; van Wijk RG; Zuberbier T; Guyatt G; Bousquet J; Schünemann HJ Allergy; 2008 Jan; 63(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18053015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT. Schünemann HJ; Wiercioch W; Brozek J; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Mustafa RA; Manja V; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Falavigna M; Alhazzani W; Santesso N; Zhang Y; Meerpohl JJ; Morgan RL; Rochwerg B; Darzi A; Rojas MX; Carrasco-Labra A; Adi Y; AlRayees Z; Riva J; Bollig C; Moore A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Cuello C; Waziry R; Akl EA J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():101-110. PubMed ID: 27713072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines 2010: implementing GRADE and achieving consensus. Gillis AM; Skanes AC; Can J Cardiol; 2011; 27(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 21329859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Brozek JL; Akl EA; Alonso-Coello P; Lang D; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lelgemann M; Lethaby A; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Allergy; 2009 May; 64(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 19210357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies. Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper. Alper BS; Oettgen P; Kunnamo I; Iorio A; Ansari MT; Murad MH; Meerpohl JJ; Qaseem A; Hultcrantz M; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt G; BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027445. PubMed ID: 31167868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A case for clarity, consistency, and helpfulness: state-of-the-art clinical practice guidelines in endocrinology using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation system. Swiglo BA; Murad MH; Schünemann HJ; Kunz R; Vigersky RA; Guyatt GH; Montori VM J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2008 Mar; 93(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 18171699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Above the GRADE: Evaluation of Guidelines in Critical Care Medicine. Sims CR; Warner MA; Stelfox HT; Hyder JA Crit Care Med; 2019 Jan; 47(1):109-113. PubMed ID: 30303840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (confidence in the estimates of effect)]. Meerpohl JJ; Langer G; Perleth M; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann H Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):449-56. PubMed ID: 22857733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [GRADE system: classification of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation]. Aguayo-Albasini JL; Flores-Pastor B; Soria-Aledo V Cir Esp; 2014 Feb; 92(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 24361098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Senior GRADE methodologists encounter challenges as part of WHO guideline development panels: an inductive content analysis. Alexander PE; Li SA; Gionfriddo MR; Stoltzfus RJ; Neumann I; Brito JP; Djulbegovic B; Montori VM; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():123-8. PubMed ID: 26385188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How to use a clinical practice guideline. Dahm P; Yeung LL; Gallucci M; Simone G; Schünemann HJ J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 19084846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Evidence-based medicine is gold standard for medical guidelines]. Pfennig A; Hölter G Psychiatr Prax; 2011 Jul; 38(5):218-20. PubMed ID: 21695665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. Atkins D; Eccles M; Flottorp S; Guyatt GH; Henry D; Hill S; Liberati A; O'Connell D; Oxman AD; Phillips B; Schünemann H; Edejer TT; Vist GE; Williams JW; BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 4(1):38. PubMed ID: 15615589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Grades of recommendation for antithrombotic agents: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Guyatt GH; Cook DJ; Jaeschke R; Pauker SG; Schünemann HJ Chest; 2008 Jun; 133(6 Suppl):123S-131S. PubMed ID: 18574262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. GRADE good practice statements: a time to say "good-bye"? A new typology for normative statements on interventions. Norris SL J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jul; 171():111371. PubMed ID: 38677562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Diagnostic accuracy and linked evidence--testing the chain]. Schünemann HJ; Mustafa R; Brozek J Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 22682410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of evidence underlying guidelines by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Brock CO; Blackwell SC; Chauhan SP Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):223.e1-223.e10. PubMed ID: 32835718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]