These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25445059)

  • 1. Data-analytical stability of cluster-wise and peak-wise inference in fMRI data analysis.
    Roels SP; Bossier H; Loeys T; Moerkerke B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():37-47. PubMed ID: 25445059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences.
    Mikl M; Marecek R; Hlustík P; Pavlicová M; Drastich A; Chlebus P; Brázdil M; Krupa P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 26(4):490-503. PubMed ID: 18060720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods.
    Hayasaka S; Phan KL; Liberzon I; Worsley KJ; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):676-87. PubMed ID: 15193596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of spatial smoothing on inter-subject correlation based analysis of FMRI.
    Pajula J; Tohka J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 32(9):1114-24. PubMed ID: 24970023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
    Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): random permutations and cluster size control.
    Stelzer J; Chen Y; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():69-82. PubMed ID: 23041526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical comparison of surface-based and volume-based group studies in neuroimaging.
    Tucholka A; Fritsch V; Poline JB; Thirion B
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1443-53. PubMed ID: 22732555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of certain methodological choices on multivariate analysis of fMRI data with support vector machines.
    Etzel JA; Valchev N; Keysers C
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):1159-67. PubMed ID: 20817107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation and optimization of fMRI single-subject processing pipelines with NPAIRS and second-level CVA.
    Zhang J; Anderson JR; Liang L; Pulapura SK; Gatewood L; Rottenberg DA; Strother SC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 27(2):264-78. PubMed ID: 18849131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. fMRI bold signal analysis using a novel nonparametric statistical method.
    De Mazière PA; Van Hulle MM
    J Magn Reson; 2007 Mar; 185(1):138-51. PubMed ID: 17196411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A high performance 3D cluster-based test of unsmoothed fMRI data.
    Li H; Nickerson LD; Xiong J; Zou Q; Fan Y; Ma Y; Shi T; Ge J; Gao JH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Sep; 98():537-46. PubMed ID: 24836011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Denoising functional MR images: a comparison of wavelet denoising and Gaussian smoothing.
    Wink AM; Roerdink JB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):374-87. PubMed ID: 15027530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kernel Granger causality mapping effective connectivity on FMRI data.
    Liao W; Marinazzo D; Pan Z; Gong Q; Chen H
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1825-35. PubMed ID: 19709972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional overestimation due to spatial smoothing of fMRI data.
    Liu P; Calhoun V; Chen Z
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Nov; 291():1-12. PubMed ID: 28789993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring fMRI reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient.
    Caceres A; Hall DL; Zelaya FO; Williams SC; Mehta MA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(3):758-68. PubMed ID: 19166942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses.
    Thirion B; Pinel P; Mériaux S; Roche A; Dehaene S; Poline JB
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 17239619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian fMRI time series analysis with spatial priors.
    Penny WD; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):350-62. PubMed ID: 15627578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Group-level impacts of within- and between-subject hemodynamic variability in fMRI.
    Badillo S; Vincent T; Ciuciu P
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 82():433-48. PubMed ID: 23735261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive smoothing based on Gaussian processes regression increases the sensitivity and specificity of fMRI data.
    Strappini F; Gilboa E; Pitzalis S; Kay K; McAvoy M; Nehorai A; Snyder AZ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Mar; 38(3):1438-1459. PubMed ID: 27943516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thresholds in fMRI studies: reliable for single subjects?
    Stevens MT; D'Arcy RC; Stroink G; Clarke DB; Beyea SD
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Oct; 219(2):312-23. PubMed ID: 23958749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.