These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25445113)

  • 1. The paradox of public participation in the healthcare in Poland--what citizens want, and what they think.
    Kolasa K; Dohnalik J; Borek E; Siemiątkowski M; Scibiorski C
    Health Policy; 2014 Nov; 118(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 25445113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Importance of public participation in decision-making process in healthcare system illustarted with an example of the development of American and Polish scope of health benefit basket.
    Kolasa K; Hermanowski T; Borek E
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2013; 67(4):661-6, 749-54. PubMed ID: 24741914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the community want devolved authority? Results of deliberative polling in Ontario.
    Abelson J; Lomas J; Eyles J; Birch S; Veenstra G
    CMAJ; 1995 Aug; 153(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 7634217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are pricing and reimbursement decision-making criteria aligned with public preferences regarding allocation principles in the Polish healthcare sector?
    Kolasa K
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Oct; 14(5):751-62. PubMed ID: 25052370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Citizens' views on health care.
    Calnan M
    J Manag Med; 1995; 9(4):17-23. PubMed ID: 10144762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making.
    Wortley S; Tong A; Howard K
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 Mar; 41(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27050156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [POLISH CITIZENS' OPINIONS CONCERNING CO-PAYMENT FOR HOSPITALIZATION AND SUBSIDIES FOR NON-STANDARD BENEFITS].
    Kemicer-Chmielewska E; Rotter I; Kotwas A; Karakiewicz B
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2014; 60(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 26591118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Involvement that makes an impact on healthcare: Perceptions of the Swedish public.
    Fredriksson M; Eriksson M; Tritter JQ
    Scand J Public Health; 2018 Jun; 46(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 29090622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Danish Citizens' Expectations to the Use of eHealth.
    Bertelsen P; Tornbjerg K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 208():78-82. PubMed ID: 25676951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.
    Gooberman-Hill R; Horwood J; Calnan M
    Health Expect; 2008 Sep; 11(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 18816323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychiatric patients' preferences and experiences in clinical decision-making: examining concordance and correlates of patients' preferences.
    De las Cuevas C; Peñate W; de Rivera L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Aug; 96(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 24894880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does it matter whose opinion we seek regarding the allocation of healthcare resources? - a case study.
    Kolasa K; Lewandowski T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Dec; 15():564. PubMed ID: 26683840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public dialogue on healthcare prioritisation.
    Rosén P
    Health Policy; 2006 Nov; 79(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 16386819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient empowerment as a component of health system reforms: rights, benefits and vested interests.
    Colombo C; Moja L; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Liberati A; Mosconi P
    Intern Emerg Med; 2012 Apr; 7(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 22278387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Involving patients, the insured and the general public in healthcare decision making].
    Mühlbacher AC; Juhnke C
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2016; 110-111():36-44. PubMed ID: 26875034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of contemporary user involvement within healthcare systems across England, Poland and Slovenia.
    Lichon M; Kavcic M; Masterson D
    J Health Organ Manag; 2015; 29(5):625-36. PubMed ID: 26222881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Citizens' preferences on healthcare expenditure allocation: evidence from Greece.
    Xesfingi S; Vozikis A; Pollalis Y
    Health Expect; 2016 Dec; 19(6):1265-1276. PubMed ID: 27878936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.
    Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making.
    Abelson J; Forest PG; Casebeer A; Mackean G;
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2004 Oct; 9(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 15526385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Criteria for medical prioritisation: results from a regional survey and methodological reflections].
    Stumpf S; Hecker S; Raspe H
    Gesundheitswesen; 2014 Apr; 76(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 23913398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.