These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25445247)

  • 1. An empirical solution for over-pruning with a novel ensemble-learning method for fMRI decoding.
    Hirose S; Nambu I; Naito E
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 239():238-45. PubMed ID: 25445247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sparse estimation automatically selects voxels relevant for the decoding of fMRI activity patterns.
    Yamashita O; Sato MA; Yoshioka T; Tong F; Kamitani Y
    Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 42(4):1414-29. PubMed ID: 18598768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decoding the individual finger movements from single-trial functional magnetic resonance imaging recordings of human brain activity.
    Shen G; Zhang J; Wang M; Lei D; Yang G; Zhang S; Du X
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 39(12):2071-82. PubMed ID: 24661456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved sparse decomposition based on a smoothed L0 norm using a Laplacian kernel to select features from fMRI data.
    Zhang C; Song S; Wen X; Yao L; Long Z
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Apr; 245():15-24. PubMed ID: 25681758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voxel selection in FMRI data analysis based on sparse representation.
    Li Y; Namburi P; Yu Z; Guan C; Feng J; Gu Z
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Oct; 56(10):2439-51. PubMed ID: 19567340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint sparse representation of brain activity patterns in multi-task fMRI data.
    Ramezani M; Marble K; Trang H; Johnsrude IS; Abolmaesumi P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Jan; 34(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 25073167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decoding brain states from fMRI connectivity graphs.
    Richiardi J; Eryilmaz H; Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Van De Ville D
    Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(2):616-26. PubMed ID: 20541019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-subject neural code converter for visual image representation.
    Yamada K; Miyawaki Y; Kamitani Y
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():289-97. PubMed ID: 25842289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Euler Elastica Regularized Logistic Regression for Whole-Brain Decoding of fMRI Data.
    Zhang C; Yao L; Song S; Wen X; Zhao X; Long Z
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Jul; 65(7):1639-1653. PubMed ID: 28952931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretable whole-brain prediction analysis with GraphNet.
    Grosenick L; Klingenberg B; Katovich K; Knutson B; Taylor JE
    Neuroimage; 2013 May; 72():304-21. PubMed ID: 23298747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iterative approach of dual regression with a sparse prior enhances the performance of independent component analysis for group functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data.
    Kim YH; Kim J; Lee JH
    Neuroimage; 2012 Dec; 63(4):1864-89. PubMed ID: 22939873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pairwise Classifier Ensemble with Adaptive Sub-Classifiers for fMRI Pattern Analysis.
    Kim E; Park H
    Neurosci Bull; 2017 Feb; 33(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 27838826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting brain states associated with object categories from fMRI data.
    Behroozi M; Daliri MR
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 13(4):645-67. PubMed ID: 25352153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grouped sparse Bayesian learning for voxel selection in multivoxel pattern analysis of fMRI data.
    Wen Z; Yu T; Yu Z; Li Y
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():417-430. PubMed ID: 30240902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining multivariate voxel selection and support vector machines for mapping and classification of fMRI spatial patterns.
    De Martino F; Valente G; Staeren N; Ashburner J; Goebel R; Formisano E
    Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 43(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 18672070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning by doing versus learning by thinking: An fMRI study of motor and mental training.
    Nyberg L; Eriksson J; Larsson A; Marklund P
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):711-7. PubMed ID: 16214184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sparse regularization techniques provide novel insights into outcome integration processes.
    Mohr H; Wolfensteller U; Frimmel S; Ruge H
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():163-76. PubMed ID: 25467302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single session motor learning demonstrated using a visuomotor task: Evidence from fMRI and behavioural analysis.
    Boe SG; Cassidy RJ; McIlroy WE; Graham SJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Aug; 209(2):308-19. PubMed ID: 22743802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain State Decoding Based on fMRI Using Semisupervised Sparse Representation Classifications.
    Zhang J; Zhang C; Yao L; Zhao X; Long Z
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2018; 2018():3956536. PubMed ID: 29849545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting subject-driven actions and sensory experience in a virtual world with relevance vector machine regression of fMRI data.
    Valente G; De Martino F; Esposito F; Goebel R; Formisano E
    Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(2):651-61. PubMed ID: 20888922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.