These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25445816)

  • 21. Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants.
    Hazrati O; Lee J; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1607-14. PubMed ID: 23464030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
    van Besouw RM; Forrester L; Crowe ND; Rowan D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cochlear implant speech intelligibility outcomes with structured and unstructured binary mask errors.
    Kressner AA; Westermann A; Buchholz JM; Rozell CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):800-10. PubMed ID: 26936562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants.
    Hochmair I; Hochmair E; Nopp P; Waller M; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():14-23. PubMed ID: 25456089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. PET-imaging of brain plasticity after cochlear implantation.
    Strelnikov K; Marx M; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():180-7. PubMed ID: 25448166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
    Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants.
    Langner F; Saoji AA; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():96-107. PubMed ID: 28104408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Importance of cochlear health for implant function.
    Pfingst BE; Zhou N; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Garadat SN; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Budenz CL; Raphael Y; Zwolan TA
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():77-88. PubMed ID: 25261772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The early days of the multi channel cochlear implant: efforts and achievement in France.
    Chouard CH
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():47-51. PubMed ID: 25499127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
    Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1430-42. PubMed ID: 25786954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
    Peng SC; Chatterjee M; Lu N
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory midbrain implant: research and development towards a second clinical trial.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():212-23. PubMed ID: 25613994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.
    Sullivan JR; Assmann PF; Hossain S; Schafer EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1643. PubMed ID: 28372046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
    Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1246. PubMed ID: 25190398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Early UCSF contributions to the development of multiple-channel cochlear implants.
    Merzenich MM
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():39-46. PubMed ID: 25560478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.