These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25445817)

  • 1. Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.
    Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():67-76. PubMed ID: 25445817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Laurello SA
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical auditory evoked potentials as an objective measure of behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    Visram AS; Innes-Brown H; El-Deredy W; McKay CM
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():35-42. PubMed ID: 25959269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting a decent (but sparse) signal to the brain for users of cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():24-38. PubMed ID: 25500178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of cochlear health for implant function.
    Pfingst BE; Zhou N; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Garadat SN; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Budenz CL; Raphael Y; Zwolan TA
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():77-88. PubMed ID: 25261772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What can stimulus polarity and interphase gap tell us about auditory nerve function in cochlear-implant recipients?
    Hughes ML; Choi S; Glickman E
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():50-63. PubMed ID: 29307495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The temporal mismatch across listening sides affects cortical auditory evoked responses in normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users with contralateral acoustic hearing.
    Dolhopiatenko H; Segovia-Martinez M; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 451():109088. PubMed ID: 39032483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Considering optogenetic stimulation for cochlear implants.
    Jeschke M; Moser T
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():224-34. PubMed ID: 25601298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.
    Svirsky MA; Talavage TM; Sinha S; Neuburger H; Azadpour M
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():163-70. PubMed ID: 25445816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and evaluation of the Nurotron 26-electrode cochlear implant system.
    Zeng FG; Rebscher SJ; Fu QJ; Chen H; Sun X; Yin L; Ping L; Feng H; Yang S; Gong S; Yang B; Kang HY; Gao N; Chi F
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():188-99. PubMed ID: 25281795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring temporal response properties of auditory nerve fibers in cochlear implant recipients.
    Tabibi S; Kegel A; Lai WK; Bruce IC; Dillier N
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():187-196. PubMed ID: 31325737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeled auditory nerve responses to amplitude modulated cochlear implant stimulation.
    van Gendt MJ; Briaire JJ; Kalkman RK; Frijns JHM
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():19-33. PubMed ID: 28625417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.
    Clark GM
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():4-13. PubMed ID: 25159273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
    Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations.
    Santarelli R; del Castillo I; Cama E; Scimemi P; Starr A
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt B):200-12. PubMed ID: 26188103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.