379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25446264)
1. The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.
Xiang J; Siddiqui AH; Meng H
J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3882-90. PubMed ID: 25446264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local hemodynamics at the rupture point of cerebral aneurysms determined by computational fluid dynamics analysis.
Omodaka S; Sugiyama S; Inoue T; Funamoto K; Fujimura M; Shimizu H; Hayase T; Takahashi A; Tominaga T
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2012; 34(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 22965244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardized viscosity as a source of error in computational fluid dynamic simulations of cerebral aneurysms.
Fillingham P; Belur N; Sweem R; Barbour MC; Marsh LMM; Aliseda A; Levitt MR
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1499-1508. PubMed ID: 38150511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approximating hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms with steady flow simulations.
Geers AJ; Larrabide I; Morales HG; Frangi AF
J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 24262847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study of wall shear stress in 12 aneurysms with respect to different viscosity models and flow conditions.
Evju Ø; Valen-Sendstad K; Mardal KA
J Biomech; 2013 Nov; 46(16):2802-8. PubMed ID: 24099744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk.
Xiang J; Tremmel M; Kolega J; Levy EI; Natarajan SK; Meng H
J Neurointerv Surg; 2012 Sep; 4(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 21990529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the influence of inlet boundary conditions on computational fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms: a virtual experiment.
Pereira VM; Brina O; Marcos Gonzales A; Narata AP; Bijlenga P; Schaller K; Lovblad KO; Ouared R
J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(9):1531-9. PubMed ID: 23602597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distinctive flow pattern of wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index: similarity and dissimilarity in ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysm blebs.
Kawaguchi T; Nishimura S; Kanamori M; Takazawa H; Omodaka S; Sato K; Maeda N; Yokoyama Y; Midorikawa H; Sasaki T; Nishijima M
J Neurosurg; 2012 Oct; 117(4):774-80. PubMed ID: 22920960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of inlet velocity profiles on patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulations of the carotid bifurcation.
Campbell IC; Ries J; Dhawan SS; Quyyumi AA; Taylor WR; Oshinski JN
J Biomech Eng; 2012 May; 134(5):051001. PubMed ID: 22757489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computational Hemodynamic Analysis for the Diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Changes in Intracranial Aneurysms: A Proof-of-Concept Study Using 3 Cases Harboring Atherosclerotic and Nonatherosclerotic Aneurysms Simultaneously.
Sugiyama SI; Endo H; Niizuma K; Endo T; Funamoto K; Ohta M; Tominaga T
Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():2386031. PubMed ID: 27703491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms obtained by magnetic resonance fluid dynamics (MRFD) based on time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.
Isoda H; Ohkura Y; Kosugi T; Hirano M; Takeda H; Hiramatsu H; Yamashita S; Takehara Y; Alley MT; Bammer R; Pelc NJ; Namba H; Sakahara H
Neuroradiology; 2010 Oct; 52(10):921-8. PubMed ID: 20012431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wall shear stress at the initiation site of cerebral aneurysms.
Geers AJ; Morales HG; Larrabide I; Butakoff C; Bijlenga P; Frangi AF
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Feb; 16(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 27440126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mind the gap: impact of computational fluid dynamics solution strategy on prediction of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics and rupture status indicators.
Valen-Sendstad K; Steinman DA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):536-43. PubMed ID: 24231854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An approach to quantitative assessment of hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured ophthalmic artery aneurysms.
Yu H; Li H; Liu J; Yang X
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016 Oct; 19(13):1456-61. PubMed ID: 26912185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modelling lower-limb peripheral arterial disease using clinically available datasets: impact of inflow boundary conditions on hemodynamic indices for restenosis prediction.
Ninno F; Chiastra C; Colombo M; Dardik A; Strosberg D; Aboian E; Tsui J; Bartlett M; Balabani S; Díaz-Zuccarini V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jun; 251():108214. PubMed ID: 38759252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Parent Artery Segmentation and Boundary Conditions on Hemodynamic Characteristics of Intracranial Aneurysms.
Hua Y; Oh JH; Kim YB
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Sep; 56(5):1328-37. PubMed ID: 26256976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stagnation and complex flow in ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a possible association with hemostatic pattern.
Tsuji M; Ishikawa T; Ishida F; Furukawa K; Miura Y; Shiba M; Sano T; Tanemura H; Umeda Y; Shimosaka S; Suzuki H
J Neurosurg; 2017 May; 126(5):1566-1572. PubMed ID: 27257837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational fluid dynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysmal bleb formation.
Russell JH; Kelson N; Barry M; Pearcy M; Fletcher DF; Winter CD
Neurosurgery; 2013 Dec; 73(6):1061-8; discussion 1068-9. PubMed ID: 23949275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Numerical investigation of the hemodynamics in anatomically realistic lateral cerebral aneurysms.
Valencia A; Munizaga J; Rivera R; Bravo E
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2616-21. PubMed ID: 21096182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computational analysis of effects of external carotid artery flow and occlusion on adverse carotid bifurcation hemodynamics.
Hyun S; Kleinstreuer C; Archie JP
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jun; 37(6):1248-54. PubMed ID: 12764272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
