These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25446555)

  • 1. The current state of physical activity assessment tools.
    Ainsworth B; Cahalin L; Buman M; Ross R
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 25446555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents.
    Sirard JR; Pate RR
    Sports Med; 2001; 31(6):439-54. PubMed ID: 11394563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity.
    Tudor-Locke C; Williams JE; Reis JP; Pluto D
    Sports Med; 2002; 32(12):795-808. PubMed ID: 12238942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness?
    Vanhees L; Lefevre J; Philippaerts R; Martens M; Huygens W; Troosters T; Beunen G
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 12(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 15785295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application.
    Corder K; Brage S; Ekelund U
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2007 Sep; 10(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 17693743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urban Latino school children's physical activity correlates and daily physical activity participation: a social cognitive approach.
    Gao Z
    Psychol Health Med; 2012; 17(5):542-50. PubMed ID: 22304333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective physical activity measurement in people with multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature.
    Casey B; Coote S; Donnelly A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):124-131. PubMed ID: 28285547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical use of objective measures of physical activity.
    Trost SG; O'Neil M
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 48(3):178-81. PubMed ID: 24311601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of physical activity by telephone interview versus objective monitoring.
    Strath SJ; Bassett DR; Ham SA; Swartz AM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2112-8. PubMed ID: 14652510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motion Sensor Use for Physical Activity Data: Methodological Considerations.
    McCarthy M; Grey M
    Nurs Res; 2015; 64(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 26126065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.
    Dowd KP; Szeklicki R; Minetto MA; Murphy MH; Polito A; Ghigo E; van der Ploeg H; Ekelund U; Maciaszek J; Stemplewski R; Tomczak M; Donnelly AE
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2018 Feb; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 29422051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical activity assessment in the general population; instrumental methods and new technologies.
    Aparicio-Ugarriza R; Mielgo-Ayuso J; Benito PJ; Pedrero-Chamizo R; Ara I; González-Gross M;
    Nutr Hosp; 2015 Feb; 31 Suppl 3():219-26. PubMed ID: 25719789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceived competence and enjoyment in predicting students' physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness.
    Gao Z
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 19093598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Assessment of physical activity].
    Naito Y; Sato S; Kitamura A; Iida M
    Nihon Rinsho; 2000 Sep; 58 Suppl():169-73. PubMed ID: 11085109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: an overview of currently available and proposed new measures.
    Schutz Y; Weinsier RL; Hunter GR
    Obes Res; 2001 Jun; 9(6):368-79. PubMed ID: 11399784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accelerometer-based measures in physical activity surveillance: current practices and issues.
    Pedišić Ž; Bauman A
    Br J Sports Med; 2015 Feb; 49(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 25370153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliable assessment of physical activity in disease: an update on activity monitors.
    Westerterp KR
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2014 Sep; 17(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 25105926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study: HUNT 1.
    Kurtze N; Rangul V; Hustvedt BE; Flanders WD
    Scand J Public Health; 2008 Jan; 36(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 18426785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of hip-mounted uniaxial accelerometry with heart-rate monitoring vs. triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of free-living energy expenditure in young children: the IDEFICS Validation Study.
    Ojiambo R; Konstabel K; Veidebaum T; Reilly J; Verbestel V; Huybrechts I; Sioen I; Casajús JA; Moreno LA; Vicente-Rodriguez G; Bammann K; Tubic BM; Marild S; Westerterp K; Pitsiladis YP;
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2012 Nov; 113(10):1530-6. PubMed ID: 22995396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objectively measured physical activity and inflammatory cytokine levels in middle-aged Japanese people.
    Nishida Y; Higaki Y; Taguchi N; Hara M; Nakamura K; Nanri H; Imaizumi T; Sakamoto T; Horita M; Shinchi K; Tanaka K
    Prev Med; 2014 Jul; 64():81-7. PubMed ID: 24732722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.