These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Advantages and Limitations of Wearable Activity Trackers: Considerations for Patients and Clinicians. Walker RK; Hickey AM; Freedson PS Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Dec; 20(6):606-610. PubMed ID: 27857250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Is a coded physical activity diary valid for assessing physical activity level and energy expenditure in stroke patients? Vanroy C; Vanlandewijck Y; Cras P; Feys H; Truijen S; Michielsen M; Vissers D PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98735. PubMed ID: 24905345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Objective monitoring of physical activity in children: considerations for instrument selection. McClain JJ; Tudor-Locke C J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Sep; 12(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 19054715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Selection, use and psychometric properties of physical activity measures to assess individuals with severe mental illness: a narrative synthesis. Soundy A; Roskell C; Stubbs B; Vancampfort D Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2014 Apr; 28(2):135-51. PubMed ID: 24673789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. How is physical activity monitored in people following stroke? Fini NA; Holland AE; Keating J; Simek J; Bernhardt J Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(19):1717-31. PubMed ID: 25374044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Can Building Design Impact Physical Activity? A Natural Experiment. Eyler AA; Hipp A; Valko CA; Ramadas R; Zwald M J Phys Act Health; 2018 May; 15(5):355-360. PubMed ID: 29493373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Using pedometers to promote physical activity among working urban women. Garbers S; Nelson JA; Rosenberg T; Chiasson MA Prev Chronic Dis; 2006 Apr; 3(2):A67. PubMed ID: 16539808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Intra-individual variation and estimates of usual physical activity. Levin S; Jacobs DR; Ainsworth BE; Richardson MT; Leon AS Ann Epidemiol; 1999 Nov; 9(8):481-8. PubMed ID: 10549881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Are Older Adults Ready for Wireless Physical Activity Tracking Devices? A Comparison of Commonly Used Tracking Devices. Tocci FL; Morey MC; Caves KM; Deberry J; Leahy GD; Hall K J Am Geriatr Soc; 2016 Jan; 64(1):226-8. PubMed ID: 26782889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Occupational physical activity assessment for chronic disease prevention and management: A review of methods for both occupational health practitioners and researchers. Scott KA; Browning RC J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(6):451-63. PubMed ID: 26853736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Physical activity classification meets daily life: Review on existing methodologies and open challenges. Awais M; Mellone S; Chiari L Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():5050-3. PubMed ID: 26737426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Pate RR Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 1993; 33(4-5):321-6. PubMed ID: 8357491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Framework for physical activity as a complex and multidimensional behavior. Pettee Gabriel KK; Morrow JR; Woolsey AL J Phys Act Health; 2012 Jan; 9 Suppl 1():S11-8. PubMed ID: 22287443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Chen KY; Bassett DR Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2005 Nov; 37(11 Suppl):S490-500. PubMed ID: 16294112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A hitchhiker's guide to assessing young people's physical activity: Deciding what method to use. Dollman J; Okely AD; Hardy L; Timperio A; Salmon J; Hills AP J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Sep; 12(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 19038579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]