These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25446963)

  • 1. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention in near space.
    Longo MR; Trippier S; Vagnoni E; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():350-7. PubMed ID: 25446963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The right hemisphere is independent from the left hemisphere in allocating visuospatial attention.
    Zuanazzi A; Cattaneo L
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():197-205. PubMed ID: 28602998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis.
    Foxe JJ; McCourt ME; Javitt DC
    Neuroimage; 2003 Jul; 19(3):710-26. PubMed ID: 12880801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatio-temporal indications of sub-cortical involvement in leftward bias of spatial attention.
    Okon-Singer H; Podlipsky I; Siman-Tov T; Ben-Simon E; Zhdanov A; Neufeld MY; Hendler T
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(4):3010-20. PubMed ID: 21056675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers.
    Fink GR; Marshall JC; Weiss PH; Zilles K
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. PubMed ID: 11373134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.
    Rinaldi L; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Maravita A; Girelli L; Brugger P
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():34-44. PubMed ID: 29428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemispheric lateralization in top-down attention during spatial relation processing: a Granger causal model approach.
    Falasca NW; D'Ascenzo S; Di Domenico A; Onofrj M; Tommasi L; Laeng B; Franciotti R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 41(7):914-24. PubMed ID: 25704649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visuospatial neglect in near and far space: dissociation between line bisection and letter cancellation.
    Keller I; Schindler I; Kerkhoff G; von Rosen F; Golz D
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):724-31. PubMed ID: 15721185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-related reduction of hemispheric lateralisation for spatial attention: An EEG study.
    Learmonth G; Benwell CSY; Thut G; Harvey M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jun; 153():139-151. PubMed ID: 28343987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking time-on-task, spatial bias and hemispheric activation asymmetry: a neural correlate of rightward attention drift.
    Newman DP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1215-23. PubMed ID: 23583973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bisecting the mental number line in near and far space.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 19951825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revisiting the Landmark Task as a tool for studying hemispheric specialization: What's really right?
    Seydell-Greenwald A; Pu SF; Ferrara K; Chambers CE; Newport EL; Landau B
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Apr; 127():57-65. PubMed ID: 30802463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength.
    Zago L; Petit L; Mellet E; Jobard G; Crivello F; Joliot M; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt B):394-406. PubMed ID: 26626612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The precuneus and visuospatial attention in near and far space: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Mahayana IT; Tcheang L; Chen CY; Juan CH; Muggleton NG
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 25112521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.