These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25447000)

  • 1. The quality of control groups in nonrandomized studies published in the Journal of Hand Surgery.
    Johnson SP; Malay S; Chung KC
    J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Jan; 40(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 25447000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No inexplicable disagreements between real-world data-based nonrandomized controlled studies and randomized controlled trials were found.
    Mathes T; Rombey T; Kuss O; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():1-13. PubMed ID: 33359322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews incorporating evidence from nonrandomized study designs: reasons for caution when estimating health effects.
    Reeves BC; van Binsbergen J; van Weel C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S155-61. PubMed ID: 16052184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies.
    Groenwold RH; Hak E; Hoes AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18619797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review showed more consideration is needed when conducting nonrandomized studies of interventions.
    Dhiman P; Lee H; Kirtley S; Collins GS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():99-108. PubMed ID: 31589952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals.
    Dumbrigue HB; Jones JS; Esquivel JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 11753309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized and nonrandomized studies: complementary or competing?
    Pandis N; Tu YK; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 25439214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Country development and manuscript selection bias: a review of published studies.
    Yousefi-Nooraie R; Shakiba B; Mortaz-Hejri S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Aug; 6():37. PubMed ID: 16879753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Is the methodology of our original articles essentially inferior to similar papers published in English-speaking journals?].
    Reyes H; Kauffmann R; Andresen M
    Rev Med Chil; 1998 Apr; 126(4):361-2. PubMed ID: 9699364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals.
    Thakur A; Wang EC; Chiu TT; Chen W; Ko CY; Chang JT; Atkinson JB; Fonkalsrud EW; Grosfeld JL
    J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1160-4. PubMed ID: 11479847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
    Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 6: risk of bias assessment.
    Waddington H; Aloe AM; Becker BJ; Djimeu EW; Hombrados JG; Tugwell P; Wells G; Reeves B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():43-52. PubMed ID: 28351693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):713-21. PubMed ID: 20546823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions showed low inter-rater reliability and challenges in its application.
    Minozzi S; Cinquini M; Gianola S; Castellini G; Gerardi C; Banzi R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():28-35. PubMed ID: 30981833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [An article for the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine)?].
    van Gijn J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jan; 145(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11198957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals.
    Igi R
    J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Getting published well requires fulfilling editors' and reviewers' needs and desires.
    Schoenwolf GC
    Dev Growth Differ; 2013 Dec; 55(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 24131034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.