304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25448167)
1. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.
Jiam NT; Caldwell M; Deroche ML; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 352():30-39. PubMed ID: 28088500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
Peng SC; Chatterjee M; Lu N
Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voice Emotion Recognition by Mandarin-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants.
Ren L; Zhang Y; Zhang J; Qin Y; Zhang Z; Chen Z; Wei C; Liu Y
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):165-180. PubMed ID: 34288631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception of sine-wave signals by children with cochlear implants.
Nittrouer S; Kuess J; Lowenstein JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2811-22. PubMed ID: 25994709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Mao Y; Xu L
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S23-S30. PubMed ID: 27564095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.
Sullivan JR; Assmann PF; Hossain S; Schafer EC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1643. PubMed ID: 28372046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
Li T; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How Vocal Emotions Produced by Children With Cochlear Implants Are Perceived by Their Hearing Peers.
Damm SA; Sis JL; Kulkarni AM; Chatterjee M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3728-3740. PubMed ID: 31589545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech rate, rate-matching, and intelligibility in early-implanted cochlear implant users.
Freeman V; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1043. PubMed ID: 28863583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Winn MB; Moore AN
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1246. PubMed ID: 25190398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of Emotional Prosody Identification by School-Age Children With Cochlear Implants and Their Peers With Normal Hearing.
Chatterjee M; Gajre S; Kulkarni AM; Barrett KC; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):411-424. PubMed ID: 37811966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
