These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25448812)

  • 1. Systematic evaluation of non-animal test methods for skin sensitisation safety assessment.
    Reisinger K; Hoffmann S; Alépée N; Ashikaga T; Barroso J; Elcombe C; Gellatly N; Galbiati V; Gibbs S; Groux H; Hibatallah J; Keller D; Kern P; Klaric M; Kolle S; Kuehnl J; Lambrechts N; Lindstedt M; Millet M; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Natsch A; Petersohn D; Pike I; Sakaguchi H; Schepky A; Tailhardat M; Templier M; van Vliet E; Maxwell G
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Feb; 29(1):259-70. PubMed ID: 25448812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guiding principles for the implementation of non-animal safety assessment approaches for cosmetics: skin sensitisation.
    Goebel C; Aeby P; Ade N; Alépée N; Aptula A; Araki D; Dufour E; Gilmour N; Hibatallah J; Keller D; Kern P; Kirst A; Marrec-Fairley M; Maxwell G; Rowland J; Safford B; Schellauf F; Schepky A; Seaman C; Teichert T; Tessier N; Teissier S; Weltzien HU; Winkler P; Scheel J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jun; 63(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 22374415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
    McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches
    Kleinstreuer NC; Hoffmann S; Alépée N; Allen D; Ashikaga T; Casey W; Clouet E; Cluzel M; Desprez B; Gellatly N; Göbel C; Kern PS; Klaric M; Kühnl J; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Strickland J; van Vliet E; Zang Q; Petersohn D
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 May; 48(5):359-374. PubMed ID: 29474122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (I): the Cosmetics Europe database.
    Hoffmann S; Kleinstreuer N; Alépée N; Allen D; Api AM; Ashikaga T; Clouet E; Cluzel M; Desprez B; Gellatly N; Goebel C; Kern PS; Klaric M; Kühnl J; Lalko JF; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Parakhia R; van Vliet E; Zang Q; Petersohn D
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 May; 48(5):344-358. PubMed ID: 29474128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a multiparametric in vitro model of skin sensitization.
    Guyard-Nicodème M; Gerault E; Platteel M; Peschard O; Veron W; Mondon P; Pascal S; Feuilloley MG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 24496914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skin sensitisation: the Colipa strategy for developing and evaluating non-animal test methods for risk assessment.
    Maxwell G; Aeby P; Ashikaga T; Bessou-Touya S; Diembeck W; Gerberick F; Kern P; Marrec-Fairley M; Ovigne JM; Sakaguchi H; Schroeder K; Tailhardat M; Teissier S; Winkler P
    ALTEX; 2011; 28(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 21311850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assuring consumer safety without animal testing: a feasibility case study for skin sensitisation.
    Maxwell G; Aleksic M; Aptula A; Carmichael P; Fentem J; Gilmour N; Mackay C; Pease C; Pendlington R; Reynolds F; Scott D; Warner G; Westmoreland C
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Nov; 36(5):557-68. PubMed ID: 19025323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternatives for skin sensitisation: Hazard identification and potency categorisation: Report from an EPAA/CEFIC LRI/Cosmetics Europe cross sector workshop, ECHA Helsinki, April 23rd and 24th 2015.
    Basketter D; Ashikaga T; Casati S; Hubesch B; Jaworska J; de Knecht J; Landsiedel R; Manou I; Mehling A; Petersohn D; Rorije E; Rossi LH; Steiling W; Teissier S; Worth A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Nov; 73(2):660-6. PubMed ID: 26456663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: skin irritation.
    Macfarlane M; Jones P; Goebel C; Dufour E; Rowland J; Araki D; Costabel-Farkas M; Hewitt NJ; Hibatallah J; Kirst A; McNamee P; Schellauf F; Scheel J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 19393278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of a systems biology approach to skin allergy risk assessment.
    Maxwell G; Mackay C
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Nov; 36(5):521-56. PubMed ID: 19025322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a next generation risk assessment framework for the evaluation of skin sensitisation of cosmetic ingredients.
    Gilmour N; Kern PS; Alépée N; Boislève F; Bury D; Clouet E; Hirota M; Hoffmann S; Kühnl J; Lalko JF; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Nishida H; Osmani A; Petersohn D; Sekine S; van Vliet E; Klaric M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Oct; 116():104721. PubMed ID: 32645429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials.
    Mehling A; Eriksson T; Eltze T; Kolle S; Ramirez T; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Arch Toxicol; 2012 Aug; 86(8):1273-95. PubMed ID: 22707154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skin sensitisation--moving forward with non-animal testing strategies for regulatory purposes in the EU.
    Basketter D; Alépée N; Casati S; Crozier J; Eigler D; Griem P; Hubesch B; de Knecht J; Landsiedel R; Louekari K; Manou I; Maxwell G; Mehling A; Netzeva T; Petry T; Rossi LH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):531-5. PubMed ID: 24140884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials.
    Bauch C; Kolle SN; Ramirez T; Eltze T; Fabian E; Mehling A; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):489-504. PubMed ID: 22659254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.
    Natsch A; Emter R; Ellis G
    Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jan; 107(1):106-21. PubMed ID: 18832184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Assessment of the sensitizing potency of cosmetic ingredients and commodities. How will the ingredients of cosmetics and commodities be tested in Europe today and tomorrow?].
    Peiser M; Platzek T; Luch A
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2012 Mar; 55(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 22373851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expansion of the Cosmetics Europe skin sensitisation database with new substances and PPRA data.
    Hoffmann S; Alépée N; Gilmour N; Kern PS; van Vliet E; Boislève F; Bury D; Cloudet E; Klaric M; Kühnl J; Lalko JF; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Nishida H; Tam Brami MT; Varçin M; Api AM; Europe C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Jun; 131():105169. PubMed ID: 35447229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials.
    Sakaguchi H; Ryan C; Ovigne JM; Schroeder KR; Ashikaga T
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1810-20. PubMed ID: 20510347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to assess the mutagenic potential of cosmetic products without animal tests?
    Speit G
    Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19379833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.