792 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25448853)
1. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review.
Horvath JC; Forte JD; Carter O
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():213-36. PubMed ID: 25448853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conceptual and Procedural Shortcomings of the Systematic Review "Evidence That Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Generates Little-to-no Reliable Neurophysiologic Effect Beyond MEP Amplitude Modulation in Healthy Human Subjects: A Systematic Review" by Horvath and Co-workers.
Antal A; Keeser D; Priori A; Padberg F; Nitsche MA
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(4):846-9. PubMed ID: 26143023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.
Pellicciari MC; Brignani D; Miniussi C
Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():569-80. PubMed ID: 23845429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combining TMS-EEG with transcranial direct current stimulation language treatment in aphasia.
Cipollari S; Veniero D; Razzano C; Caltagirone C; Koch G; Marangolo P
Expert Rev Neurother; 2015; 15(7):833-45. PubMed ID: 26109229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 1 mA cathodal tDCS shows excitatory effects in children and adolescents: Insights from TMS evoked N100 potential.
Moliadze V; Lyzhko E; Schmanke T; Andreas S; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
Brain Res Bull; 2018 Jun; 140():43-51. PubMed ID: 29625151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).
Horvath JC; Forte JD; Carter O
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):535-50. PubMed ID: 25701175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of prefrontal bipolar and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical reactivity and working memory in healthy adults.
Hill AT; Rogasch NC; Fitzgerald PB; Hoy KE
Neuroimage; 2017 May; 152():142-157. PubMed ID: 28274831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inherent physiological artifacts in EEG during tDCS.
Gebodh N; Esmaeilpour Z; Adair D; Chelette K; Dmochowski J; Woods AJ; Kappenman ES; Parra LC; Bikson M
Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 185():408-424. PubMed ID: 30321643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motor cortex-induced plasticity by noninvasive brain stimulation: a comparison between transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Simis M; Adeyemo BO; Medeiros LF; Miraval F; Gagliardi RJ; Fregni F
Neuroreport; 2013 Dec; 24(17):973-5. PubMed ID: 24100412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.
Chew T; Ho KA; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 26294061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of tDCS stimulation of motor cortex and cerebellum on EEG classification of motor imagery and sensorimotor band power.
Angulo-Sherman IN; Rodríguez-Ugarte M; Sciacca N; Iáñez E; Azorín JM
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 14(1):31. PubMed ID: 28420382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of individual electrical fields and anatomical factors on the neurophysiological outcomes of tDCS: A TMS-MEP and MRI study.
Mosayebi-Samani M; Jamil A; Salvador R; Ruffini G; Haueisen J; Nitsche MA
Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(2):316-326. PubMed ID: 33516860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
