293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25449009)
1. Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.
Shannon RV
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():57-66. PubMed ID: 25449009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The contributions of William F. House to the field of implantable auditory devices.
Eisenberg LS
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():52-6. PubMed ID: 25159272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early UCSF contributions to the development of multiple-channel cochlear implants.
Merzenich MM
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():39-46. PubMed ID: 25560478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Getting a decent (but sparse) signal to the brain for users of cochlear implants.
Wilson BS
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():24-38. PubMed ID: 25500178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The early days of the multi channel cochlear implant: efforts and achievement in France.
Chouard CH
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():47-51. PubMed ID: 25499127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear and brainstem implantation. 2002.
Toh EH; Luxford WM
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2008 Apr; 19(2):317-29, vii. PubMed ID: 18534342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.
Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():67-76. PubMed ID: 25445817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.
Clark GM
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():4-13. PubMed ID: 25159273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and evaluation of the Nurotron 26-electrode cochlear implant system.
Zeng FG; Rebscher SJ; Fu QJ; Chen H; Sun X; Yin L; Ping L; Feng H; Yang S; Gong S; Yang B; Kang HY; Gao N; Chi F
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():188-99. PubMed ID: 25281795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of cochlear health for implant function.
Pfingst BE; Zhou N; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Garadat SN; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Budenz CL; Raphael Y; Zwolan TA
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():77-88. PubMed ID: 25261772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognizing the journey and celebrating the achievement of cochlear implants.
Zeng FG; Canlon B
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():1-3. PubMed ID: 25819292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors constraining the benefit to speech understanding of combining information from low-frequency hearing and a cochlear implant.
Dorman MF; Cook S; Spahr A; Zhang T; Loiselle L; Schramm D; Whittingham J; Gifford R
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():107-11. PubMed ID: 25285624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.
Svirsky MA; Talavage TM; Sinha S; Neuburger H; Azadpour M
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():163-70. PubMed ID: 25445816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. History of cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants.
Møller AR
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 64():1-10. PubMed ID: 16891833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Processing of speech temporal and spectral information by users of auditory brainstem implants and cochlear implants.
Azadpour M; McKay CM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e192-203. PubMed ID: 25010634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
