145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25449509)
1. Operator-blinded contact force monitoring during pulmonary vein isolation using conventional and steerable sheaths.
Kimura T; Takatsuki S; Oishi A; Negishi M; Kashimura S; Katsumata Y; Nishiyama T; Nishiyama N; Tanimoto Y; Aizawa Y; Fukuda K
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 177(3):970-6. PubMed ID: 25449509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low contact force and force-time integral predict early recovery and dormant conduction revealed by adenosine after pulmonary vein isolation.
le Polain de Waroux JB; Weerasooriya R; Anvardeen K; Barbraud C; Marchandise S; De Meester C; Goesaert C; Reis I; Scavee C
Europace; 2015 Jun; 17(6):877-83. PubMed ID: 25618742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Contact Force Monitoring in Acute Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using an Anatomic Approach. A Randomized Study.
Pedrote A; Arana-Rueda E; Arce-León A; Acosta J; Gómez-Pulido F; Martos-Maine JL; Frutos-López M; Sánchez-Brotons J; García-Riesco L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Apr; 39(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 26768692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Steerable versus non-steerable sheaths during pulmonary vein isolation: impact of left atrial enlargement on the catheter-tissue contact force.
Masuda M; Fujita M; Iida O; Okamoto S; Ishihara T; Nanto K; Kanda T; Shiraki T; Sunaga A; Matsuda Y; Uematsu M
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 47(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 27189157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective use of Ablation Index targets improves clinical outcomes following ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Hussein A; Das M; Chaturvedi V; Asfour IK; Daryanani N; Morgan M; Ronayne C; Shaw M; Snowdon R; Gupta D
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1037-1047. PubMed ID: 28639728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contact force sensing technology identifies sites of inadequate contact and reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection: a prospective case control study.
Haldar S; Jarman JW; Panikker S; Jones DG; Salukhe T; Gupta D; Wynn G; Hussain W; Markides V; Wong T
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1160-6. PubMed ID: 23219078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choice of Steerable Sheath Impacts Contact Force Stability During Pulmonary Vein Isolation.
Hiner E; Shah DP
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag; 2021 Dec; 12(12):4790-4795. PubMed ID: 34970468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective characterization of catheter-tissue contact force at different anatomic sites during antral pulmonary vein isolation.
Kumar S; Morton JB; Lee J; Halloran K; Spence SJ; Gorelik A; Hepworth G; Kistler PM; Kalman JM
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Dec; 5(6):1124-9. PubMed ID: 23087399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regional difference of optimal contact force to prevent acute pulmonary vein reconnection during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Sotomi Y; Kikkawa T; Inoue K; Tanaka K; Toyoshima Y; Oka T; Tanaka N; Nozato Y; Orihara Y; Iwakura K; Sakata Y; Fujii K
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Sep; 25(9):941-947. PubMed ID: 24762005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo contact force analysis and correlation with tissue impedance during left atrial mapping and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Makimoto H; Lin T; Rillig A; Metzner A; Wohlmuth P; Arya A; Antz M; Mathew S; Deiss S; Wissner E; Rausch P; Bardyszewski A; Kamioka M; Li X; Kuck KH; Ouyang F; Tilz RR
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24363353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo contact force measurements and correlation with left atrial anatomy during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Schluermann F; Krauss T; Biermann J; Hartmann M; Trolese L; Pache G; Bode C; Asbach S
Europace; 2015 Oct; 17(10):1526-32. PubMed ID: 25745072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Catheter-tissue contact force determines atrial electrogram characteristics before and lesion efficacy after antral pulmonary vein isolation in humans.
Kumar S; Chan M; Lee J; Wong MC; Yudi M; Morton JB; Spence SJ; Halloran K; Kistler PM; Kalman JM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 24102727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Nakagawa H; Kautzner J; Natale A; Peichl P; Cihak R; Wichterle D; Ikeda A; Santangeli P; Di Biase L; Jackman WM
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 6(4):746-53. PubMed ID: 23873143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter.
Knecht S; Reichlin T; Pavlovic N; Schaer B; Osswald S; Sticherling C; Kühne M
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 25925494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance.
Park CI; Lehrmann H; Keyl C; Weber R; Schiebeling J; Allgeier J; Schurr P; Shah A; Neumann FJ; Arentz T; Jadidi AS
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):701-8. PubMed ID: 24575734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters.
Reichlin T; Knecht S; Lane C; Kühne M; Nof E; Chopra N; Tadros TM; Reddy VY; Schaer B; John RM; Osswald S; Stevenson WG; Sticherling C; Michaud GF
Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24177370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
Matsuda H; Parwani AS; Attanasio P; Huemer M; Wutzler A; Blaschke F; Haverkamp W; Boldt LH
Heart Vessels; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1544-52. PubMed ID: 26498938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation.
Jourda F; Providencia R; Marijon E; Bouzeman A; Hireche H; Khoueiry Z; Cardin C; Combes N; Combes S; Boveda S; Albenque JP
Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 25186456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of lesion formation between contact force-guided and non-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: a prospective, randomized study.
Kimura M; Sasaki S; Owada S; Horiuchi D; Sasaki K; Itoh T; Ishida Y; Kinjo T; Tomita H; Okumura K
Heart Rhythm; 2014 Jun; 11(6):984-91. PubMed ID: 24657428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study.
Neuzil P; Reddy VY; Kautzner J; Petru J; Wichterle D; Shah D; Lambert H; Yulzari A; Wissner E; Kuck KH
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 6(2):327-33. PubMed ID: 23515263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
