543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25450146)
21. Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Meesen RLJ; Dechent P; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Apr; 41(6):1644-1666. PubMed ID: 31860160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition.
Antal A; Terney D; Kühnl S; Paulus W
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2010 May; 39(5):890-903. PubMed ID: 20471549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES).
Bortoletto M; Rodella C; Salvador R; Miranda PC; Miniussi C
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. a-tDCS differential modulation of corticospinal excitability: the effects of electrode size.
Bastani A; Jaberzadeh S
Brain Stimul; 2013 Nov; 6(6):932-7. PubMed ID: 23664681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson's disease.
Fregni F; Boggio PS; Santos MC; Lima M; Vieira AL; Rigonatti SP; Silva MT; Barbosa ER; Nitsche MA; Pascual-Leone A
Mov Disord; 2006 Oct; 21(10):1693-702. PubMed ID: 16817194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Increased short latency afferent inhibition after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
Scelzo E; Giannicola G; Rosa M; Ciocca M; Ardolino G; Cogiamanian F; Ferrucci R; Fumagalli M; Mameli F; Barbieri S; Priori A
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jul; 498(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 21600266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on I-wave activity in humans.
Lang N; Nitsche MA; Dileone M; Mazzone P; De Andrés-Arés J; Diaz-Jara L; Paulus W; Di Lazzaro V; Oliviero A
J Neurophysiol; 2011 Jun; 105(6):2802-10. PubMed ID: 21430275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates motor responses evoked by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Cambieri C; Scelzo E; Li Voti P; Priori A; Accornero N; Inghilleri M
Neurosci Lett; 2012 Aug; 522(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 22732445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans.
Nitsche MA; Fricke K; Henschke U; Schlitterlau A; Liebetanz D; Lang N; Henning S; Tergau F; Paulus W
J Physiol; 2003 Nov; 553(Pt 1):293-301. PubMed ID: 12949224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans.
Boros K; Poreisz C; Münchau A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 27(5):1292-300. PubMed ID: 18312584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of conventional transcranial direct current stimulation devices and electrode sizes on motor cortical excitability of the quadriceps muscle.
Gardi AZ; Vogel AK; Dharia AK; Krishnan C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2021; 39(5):379-391. PubMed ID: 34657855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enhancement of Cortical Excitability and Lower Limb Motor Function in Patients With Stroke by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Chang MC; Kim DY; Park DH
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):561-6. PubMed ID: 25736569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cumulative effects of anodal and priming cathodal tDCS on pegboard test performance and motor cortical excitability.
Christova M; Rafolt D; Gallasch E
Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():27-33. PubMed ID: 25804362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans.
Bashir S; Ahmad S; Alatefi M; Hamza A; Sharaf M; Fecteau S; Yoo WK
Physiol Rep; 2019 Jul; 7(13):e14087. PubMed ID: 31301123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
Ho KA; Taylor JL; Loo CK
J ECT; 2015 Mar; 31(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25010032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modulation of cortical activity after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the lower limb motor cortex: a functional MRI study.
Kim CR; Kim DY; Kim LS; Chun MH; Kim SJ; Park CH
Brain Stimul; 2012 Oct; 5(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 21962977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects.
Lang N; Siebner HR; Ernst D; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Lemon RN; Rothwell JC
Biol Psychiatry; 2004 Nov; 56(9):634-9. PubMed ID: 15522246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
