These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25450146)

  • 41. Comparison of the after-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex in patients with stroke and healthy volunteers.
    Suzuki K; Fujiwara T; Tanaka N; Tsuji T; Masakado Y; Hase K; Kimura A; Liu M
    Int J Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 122(11):675-81. PubMed ID: 22747238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Simultaneous stimulation using rTMS and tDCS produces the most effective modulation of motor cortical excitability in healthy subjects: A pilot study.
    Wang H; Wang X; Jin J; Zhang W; Li Y; Liu Z; Yin T
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Feb; 694():46-50. PubMed ID: 30342993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans.
    Antal A; Boros K; Poreisz C; Chaieb L; Terney D; Paulus W
    Brain Stimul; 2008 Apr; 1(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 20633376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Brain transcranial direct current stimulation modulates motor excitability in mice.
    Cambiaghi M; Velikova S; Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Cursi M; Comi G; Leocani L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 31(4):704-9. PubMed ID: 20141528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Transcranial direct-current stimulation reduced the excitability of diaphragmatic corticospinal pathways whatever the polarity used.
    Azabou E; Roche N; Sharshar T; Bussel B; Lofaso F; Petitjean M
    Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2013 Oct; 189(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 23933029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of electrode angle-orientation on the impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability.
    Foerster Á; Yavari F; Farnad L; Jamil A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA; Kuo MF
    Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(2):263-266. PubMed ID: 30389333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of simultaneous bilateral tDCS of the human motor cortex.
    Mordillo-Mateos L; Turpin-Fenoll L; Millán-Pascual J; Núñez-Pérez N; Panyavin I; Gómez-Argüelles JM; Botia-Paniagua E; Foffani G; Lang N; Oliviero A
    Brain Stimul; 2012 Jul; 5(3):214-222. PubMed ID: 21782545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of anodal-tDCS on cross-limb transfer in older adults.
    Goodwill AM; Daly RM; Kidgell DJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 126(11):2189-97. PubMed ID: 25732105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
    Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents.
    Moliadze V; Schmanke T; Andreas S; Lyzhko E; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1392-9. PubMed ID: 25468234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.
    Nitsche MA; Doemkes S; Karaköse T; Antal A; Liebetanz D; Lang N; Tergau F; Paulus W
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 97(4):3109-17. PubMed ID: 17251360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates GABAB-related intracortical inhibition in the M1 of healthy individuals.
    Tremblay S; Beaulé V; Lepage JF; Théoret H
    Neuroreport; 2013 Jan; 24(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 23196416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A dissociation between propriospinal facilitation and inhibition after bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation.
    McCambridge AB; Stinear JW; Byblow WD
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Jun; 111(11):2187-95. PubMed ID: 24623508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.
    Strube W; Bunse T; Nitsche MA; Nikolaeva A; Palm U; Padberg F; Falkai P; Hasan A
    Physiol Rep; 2016 Aug; 4(15):. PubMed ID: 27495298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Can electric fields explain inter-individual variability in transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex?
    Laakso I; Mikkonen M; Koyama S; Hirata A; Tanaka S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):626. PubMed ID: 30679770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults.
    Pourmajidian M; Lauber B; Sidhu SK
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Jan; 714():134597. PubMed ID: 31689457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of anodal tDCS of the lower limb M1 on ankle reaction time in young adults.
    Devanathan D; Madhavan S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 26487179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on neuroplasticity in corticomotor pathways of the tongue muscles.
    Kothari M; Stubbs PW; Figlewski K; Pedersen AR; Jensen J; Baad-Hansen L; Svensson P; Nielsen JF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 44(9):691-701. PubMed ID: 28556188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cortical inhibition and excitation by bilateral transcranial alternating current stimulation.
    Cancelli A; Cottone C; Zito G; Di Giorgio M; Pasqualetti P; Tecchio F
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2015; 33(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 25588458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of anodal tDCS on lumbar propriospinal system in healthy subjects.
    Roche N; Lackmy A; Achache V; Bussel B; Katz R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):1027-34. PubMed ID: 22014699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.