These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25450534)

  • 1. Boosting - an unusual yet attractive optimiser.
    Hothorn T
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(6):417-8. PubMed ID: 25450534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discussion of "the evolution of boosting algorithms" and "extending statistical boosting".
    Bühlmann P; Gertheiss J; Hieke S; Kneib T; Ma S; Schumacher M; Tutz G; Wang CY; Wang Z; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(6):436-45. PubMed ID: 25396219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extending statistical boosting. An overview of recent methodological developments.
    Mayr A; Binder H; Gefeller O; Schmid M
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(6):428-35. PubMed ID: 25112429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of boosting algorithms. From machine learning to statistical modelling.
    Mayr A; Binder H; Gefeller O; Schmid M
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(6):419-27. PubMed ID: 25112367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Update on Statistical Boosting in Biomedicine.
    Mayr A; Hofner B; Waldmann E; Hepp T; Meyer S; Gefeller O
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():6083072. PubMed ID: 28831290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of knowing when to stop. A sequential stopping rule for component-wise gradient boosting.
    Mayr A; Hofner B; Schmid M
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 22344292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gradient boosting for linear mixed models.
    Griesbach C; Säfken B; Waldmann E
    Int J Biostat; 2021 Jan; 17(2):317-329. PubMed ID: 34826371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stochastic approximation boosting for incomplete data problems.
    Sexton J; Laake P
    Biometrics; 2009 Dec; 65(4):1156-63. PubMed ID: 19432768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning versus statistical modeling.
    Boulesteix AL; Schmid M
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):588-93. PubMed ID: 24615669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust loss functions for boosting.
    Kanamori T; Takenouchi T; Eguchi S; Murata N
    Neural Comput; 2007 Aug; 19(8):2183-244. PubMed ID: 17571942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mixture modelling for cluster analysis.
    McLachlan GJ; Chang SU
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Oct; 13(5):347-61. PubMed ID: 15516030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boosting method for local learning in statistical pattern recognition.
    Kawakita M; Eguchi S
    Neural Comput; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2792-838. PubMed ID: 18533822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting Medical Information Using Machine Learning and Individual Conditional Expectation.
    Nohara Y; Wakata Y; Nakashima N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():1073. PubMed ID: 26262372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deformation of log-likelihood loss function for multiclass boosting.
    Kanamori T
    Neural Netw; 2010 Sep; 23(7):843-64. PubMed ID: 20542407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Addressing cluster-constant covariates in mixed effects models via likelihood-based boosting techniques.
    Griesbach C; Groll A; Bergherr E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254178. PubMed ID: 34242316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An overview of robust methods in medical research.
    Farcomeni A; Ventura L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Apr; 21(2):111-33. PubMed ID: 20974666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust statistical boosting with quantile-based adaptive loss functions.
    Speller J; Staerk C; Mayr A
    Int J Biostat; 2023 May; 19(1):111-129. PubMed ID: 35950232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of a nonsusceptible fraction with current status data.
    Cook RJ; White BJ; Yi GY; Lee KA; Warkentin TE
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2715-30. PubMed ID: 17943708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk prediction with machine learning and regression methods.
    Steyerberg EW; van der Ploeg T; Van Calster B
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):601-6. PubMed ID: 24615859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dispersed publication of editorial research.
    Rosenberg J; Pommergaard HC; Vinther S; Burcharth J
    Dan Med J; 2015 Feb; 62(2):. PubMed ID: 25634502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.