These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25450782)

  • 1. Efficient computations with the likelihood ratio distribution.
    Kruijver M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():116-24. PubMed ID: 25450782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact computation of the distribution of likelihood ratios with forensic applications.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haned H; Snipen L; Sæbø S; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():93-101. PubMed ID: 24528587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the statistical power of DNA-based identification, exemplified by 'The missing grandchildren of Argentina'.
    Kling D; Egeland T; Piñero MH; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():57-66. PubMed ID: 28858673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An efficient Monte Carlo method for estimating Ne from temporally spaced samples using a coalescent-based likelihood.
    Anderson EC
    Genetics; 2005 Jun; 170(2):955-67. PubMed ID: 15834143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.
    Anderson EC; Garza JC
    Genetics; 2006 Apr; 172(4):2567-82. PubMed ID: 16387880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum likelihood of evolutionary trees: hardness and approximation.
    Chor B; Tuller T
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i97-106. PubMed ID: 15961504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sampling variability in forensic likelihood-ratio computation: A simulation study.
    Ali T; Spreeuwers L; Veldhuis R; Meuwly D
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):499-508. PubMed ID: 26654086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
    Egeland T; Pinto N; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():186-90. PubMed ID: 23810238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a log-normal mean.
    Wu J; Wong AC; Jiang G
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1849-60. PubMed ID: 12754720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient recursive linking algorithm for computing the likelihood of an order of a large number of genetic markers.
    Tewari S; Bhandarkar SM; Arnold J
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2006; ():191-8. PubMed ID: 17369637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of distribution algorithms with Kikuchi approximations.
    Santana R
    Evol Comput; 2005; 13(1):67-97. PubMed ID: 15901427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptively biased sequential importance sampling for rare events in reaction networks with comparison to exact solutions from finite buffer dCME method.
    Cao Y; Liang J
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Jul; 139(2):025101. PubMed ID: 23862966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multipoint linkage analysis via Metropolis jumping kernels.
    Lin S
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1417-27. PubMed ID: 8962460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binomial distribution sample confidence intervals estimation for positive and negative likelihood ratio medical key parameters.
    Bolboacă S; Jäntschi L
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():66-70. PubMed ID: 16779003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The parasite capacity of the host population].
    Kozminskiĭ EV
    Parazitologiia; 2002; 36(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 11965643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing exact genetic linkage computations.
    Fishelson M; Geiger D
    J Comput Biol; 2004; 11(2-3):263-75. PubMed ID: 15285892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for computing multivariate maximum likelihood estimates and posterior distributions: mixture dose-response assessment.
    Li R; Englehardt JD; Li X
    Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 21906114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A note on the accuracy of PAC-likelihood inference with microsatellite data.
    Cornuet JM; Beaumont MA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Feb; 71(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 16890970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stepwise mutation likelihood computation by sequential importance sampling in subdivided population models.
    De Iorio M; Griffiths RC; Leblois R; Rousset F
    Theor Popul Biol; 2005 Jul; 68(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 15890376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.