These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25450786)

  • 1. A more straightforward derivation of the LR for a database search.
    Berger CE; Vergeer P; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():156-60. PubMed ID: 25450786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood ratio and posterior odds in forensic genetics: Two sides of the same coin.
    Caliebe A; Walsh S; Liu F; Kayser M; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():203-210. PubMed ID: 28314239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The DNA database search controversy revisited: bridging the Bayesian-frequentist gap.
    Storvik G; Egeland T
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):922-5. PubMed ID: 17825021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does an English appeal court ruling increase the risks of miscarriages of justice when complex DNA profiles are searched against the national DNA database?
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():167-75. PubMed ID: 25151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familial searching: a specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the National DNA Database to identify unknown offenders via their relatives--the UK experience.
    Maguire CN; McCallum LA; Storey C; Whitaker JP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24315582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of DNA mixtures from database search.
    Chung YK; Hu YQ; Fung WK
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):233-8. PubMed ID: 19459834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Would you accept having your DNA profile inserted in the National Forensic DNA database? Why?" Results of a questionnaire applied in Portugal.
    Machado H; Silva S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 24315600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Searching mixed DNA profiles directly against profile databases.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():102-10. PubMed ID: 24528588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An illustration of the effect of various sources of uncertainty on DNA likelihood ratio calculations.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():56-63. PubMed ID: 24667729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of SmartRank: A likelihood ratio software for searching national DNA databases with complex DNA profiles.
    Benschop CCG; van de Merwe L; de Jong J; Vanvooren V; Kempenaers M; Kees van der Beek CP; Barni F; Reyes EL; Moulin L; Pene L; Haned H; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():145-153. PubMed ID: 28441635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leading-edge forensic DNA analyses and the necessity of including crime scene investigators, police officers and technicians in a DNA elimination database.
    Lapointe M; Rogic A; Bourgoin S; Jolicoeur C; Séguin D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():50-55. PubMed ID: 26117338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Searching for first-degree familial relationships in California's offender DNA database: validation of a likelihood ratio-based approach.
    Myers SP; Timken MD; Piucci ML; Sims GA; Greenwald MA; Weigand JJ; Konzak KC; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 21056023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitting the Balding-Nichols model to forensic databases.
    Rohlfs RV; Aguiar VRC; Lohmueller KE; Castro AM; Ferreira ACS; Almeida VCO; Louro ID; Nielsen R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():86-91. PubMed ID: 26186694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour.
    Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():144-53. PubMed ID: 24727432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating DNA profile evidence when the suspect is identified through a database search.
    Balding DJ; Donnelly P
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Jul; 41(4):603-7. PubMed ID: 8754570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding Y haplotype matching probability.
    Brenner CH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):233-43. PubMed ID: 24315614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice of population database for forensic DNA profile analysis.
    Steele CD; Balding DJ
    Sci Justice; 2014 Dec; 54(6):487-93. PubMed ID: 25498938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The variability in likelihood ratios due to different mechanisms.
    Bright JA; Stevenson KE; Curran JM; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():187-90. PubMed ID: 25450791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretation guidelines of a standard Y-chromosome STR 17-plex PCR-CE assay for crime casework.
    Roewer L; Geppert M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 830():43-56. PubMed ID: 22139652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.