These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25451245)

  • 21. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Dori H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1091-104. PubMed ID: 9747524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: further support for an asymmetry.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Kilb A; Fisher T
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 16686109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Gavrilescu D; Anderson ND
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):965-76. PubMed ID: 11105522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Confabulation in healthy aging is related to poor encoding and retrieval of over-learned information.
    Attali E; Dalla Barba G
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2013; 20(3):339-55. PubMed ID: 22934610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of attention in remembering important item-location associations.
    Siegel ALM; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1248-1262. PubMed ID: 29926393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age differences in encoding specificity.
    Puglisi JT; Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN
    J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P145-50. PubMed ID: 3183310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Age differences in susceptibility to memory interference during recall of categorizable but not unrelated word lists.
    Fernandes MA; Grady C
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):297-322. PubMed ID: 18726747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of division of attention during encoding and retrieval on age differences in episodic memory.
    Nyberg L; Nilsson LG; Olofsson U; Bäckman L
    Exp Aging Res; 1997; 23(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 9151074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of target detection on memory retrieval.
    Dong Y; Xiao F; Meng Y; Ye Z; Tang Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):838-854. PubMed ID: 38413503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interfering with free recall of words: Detrimental effects of phonological competition.
    Fernandes MA; Wammes JD; Priselac S; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():59-71. PubMed ID: 27174519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex differences in the cognitive effects of tobacco abstinence: a pilot study.
    Merritt PS; Cobb AR; Cook GI
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2012 Aug; 20(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 22369669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fine motor movements while drawing during the encoding phase of a serial verbal recall task reduce working memory performance.
    Tindle R; Longstaff MG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():96-102. PubMed ID: 26783694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interfering with remembering and knowing: effects of divided attention at retrieval.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17599796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.
    Guez J; Naveh-Benjamin M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74447. PubMed ID: 24040249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
    Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
    Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
    Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Memory networks supporting retrieval effort and retrieval success under conditions of full and divided attention.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA; Grady CL
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(6):386-96. PubMed ID: 19502200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retrieval of temporal structure at recall can occur automatically.
    Sadeh T; Moscovitch M
    Cognition; 2024 Jan; 242():105647. PubMed ID: 37857055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.