484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25452018)
1. Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis.
van den Akker-van Marle ME; Moojen WA; Arts MP; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
Spine J; 2016 Jun; 16(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25452018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Moojen WA; Arts MP; Jacobs WC; van Zwet EW; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Koes BW; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2295-305. PubMed ID: 25586759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.
Moojen WA; Arts MP; Jacobs WC; van Zwet EW; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Koes BW; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6415. PubMed ID: 24231273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.
Moojen WA; Arts MP; Brand R; Koes BW; Peul WC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 May; 11():100. PubMed ID: 20507568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Aas E; Lydersen S; Andresen H; Rønning R; Nygaard ØP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(8):514-20. PubMed ID: 25608246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interspinous process devices(IPD) alone versus decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao XW; Ma JX; Ma XL; Li F; He WW; Jiang X; Wang Y; Han B; Lu B
Int J Surg; 2017 Mar; 39():57-64. PubMed ID: 28110031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus microdiscectomy for sciatica: Cost utility analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial.
van den Akker-van Marle ME; Brouwer PA; Brand R; Koes B; van den Hout WB; van Buchem MA; Peul WC
Interv Neuroradiol; 2017 Oct; 23(5):538-545. PubMed ID: 28679342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy.
Parker SL; Fulchiero EC; Davis BJ; Adogwa O; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 21641874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices.
Tapp SJ; Martin BI; Tosteson TD; Lurie JD; Weinstein MC; Deyo RA; Mirza SK; Tosteson ANA
Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):584-592. PubMed ID: 28847740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.
Puzzilli F; Gazzeri R; Galarza M; Neroni M; Panagiotopoulos K; Bolognini A; Callovini G; Agrillo U; Alfieri A
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 124():166-74. PubMed ID: 25064150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22054639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Owens R; Karikari I; Agarwal V; Gottfried ON; Bagley CA; Isaacs RE; Cheng JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23231358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for the treatment of lumbar disk-related sciatica: cost utility analysis alongside a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
van den Akker ME; Arts MP; van den Hout WB; Brand R; Koes BW; Peul WC
Neurosurgery; 2011 Oct; 69(4):829-35; discussion 835-6. PubMed ID: 21623248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).
Aichmair A; Burgstaller JM; Schwenkglenks M; Steurer J; Porchet F; Brunner F; Farshad M;
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28040872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized controlled trial of the X-Stop interspinous distractor device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis with 2-year quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness outcomes.
Borg A; Hill CS; Nurboja B; Critchley G; Choi D
J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Feb; 34(4):544-552. PubMed ID: 33530059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Chiu JC
Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():265-75. PubMed ID: 17029185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.
Patel VV; Whang PG; Haley TR; Bradley WD; Nunley PD; Davis RP; Miller LE; Block JE; Geisler FH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 25494323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
