491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25452018)
21. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Cost-Utility Analysis of Lumbar Decompression With and Without Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease in the Elderly.
Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Tetreault L; Fehlings MG; McGirt MJ
Neurosurgery; 2015 Oct; 77 Suppl 4():S116-24. PubMed ID: 26378349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted.
Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Hartjen CA; Mehalic TF; Implicito DA; Martin MJ; Johnson DR; Skidmore GA; Vessa PP; Dwyer JW; Cauthen JC; Ozuna RM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):500-7. PubMed ID: 17176013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the efficacy and safety between interspinous process distraction device and open decompression surgery in treating lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta analysis.
Hong P; Liu Y; Li H
J Invest Surg; 2015 Feb; 28(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 25025237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Indications and contraindications: interspinous process decompression devices in lumbar spine surgery.
Siewe J; Selbeck M; Koy T; Röllinghoff M; Eysel P; Zarghooni K; Oppermann J; Herren C; Sobottke R
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2015 Jan; 76(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25291360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.
Nerland US; Jakola AS; Solheim O; Weber C; Rao V; Lønne G; Solberg TK; Salvesen Ø; Carlsen SM; Nygaard ØP; Gulati S
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1603. PubMed ID: 25833966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study.
Gazzeri R; Galarza M; Neroni M; Fiore C; Faiola A; Puzzilli F; Callovini G; Alfieri A
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E14. PubMed ID: 26424338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study.
Patil CG; Sarmiento JM; Ugiliweneza B; Mukherjee D; Nuño M; Liu JC; Walia S; Lad SP; Boakye M
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1484-92. PubMed ID: 24291409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interspinous distraction in lumbar spinal stenosis: a neurophysiological perspective.
Schizas C; Pralong E; Tzioupis C; Kulik G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):2113-7. PubMed ID: 24026157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-utility analysis of minimally invasive versus open multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Davis BJ; Fulchiero E; Aaronson O; Cheng J; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Feb; 26(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 21959840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion).
Cairns K; Deer T; Sayed D; van Noort K; Liang K
Pain Med; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):S2-S8. PubMed ID: 31808529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients.
Richter A; Schütz C; Hauck M; Halm H
Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 19967546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Nunley PD; Patel VV; Orndorff DG; Lavelle WF; Block JE; Geisler FH
Clin Interv Aging; 2017; 12():1409-1417. PubMed ID: 28919727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP.
Burnett MG; Stein SC; Bartels RH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jul; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 20594016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. One-year follow-up of a series of 100 patients treated for lumbar spinal canal stenosis by means of HeliFix interspinous process decompression device.
Alexandre A; Alexandre AM; De Pretto M; Corò L; Saggini R
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():176936. PubMed ID: 24822181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Design of the Verbiest trial: cost-effectiveness of surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment in patients with lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Luijsterburg PA; Brand R; Koes BW; Bierma-Zeinstra SM; Eekhof JA; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Mar; 12():57. PubMed ID: 21371314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Han B; Chen Y; Liang W; Yang Y; Ding Z; Yin P; Hai Y
Eur Spine J; 2024 Mar; 33(3):881-891. PubMed ID: 38342843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer.
Sobottke R; Röllinghoff M; Siewe J; Schlegel U; Yagdiran A; Spangenberg M; Lesch R; Eysel P; Koy T
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2010 Aug; 53(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 21132610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
