404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25452487)
1. Undergraduates achieve learning gains in plant genetics through peer teaching of secondary students.
Chrispeels HE; Klosterman ML; Martin JB; Lundy SR; Watkins JM; Gibson CL; Muday GK
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(4):641-52. PubMed ID: 25452487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer Teaching Increases Knowledge and Changes Perceptions about Genetically Modified Crops in Non-Science Major Undergraduates.
Chrispeels HE; Chapman JM; Gibson CL; Muday GK
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Jun; 18(2):ar14. PubMed ID: 31025912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High school students' learning and perceptions of phylogenetics of flowering plants.
Bokor JR; Landis JB; Crippen KJ
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(4):653-65. PubMed ID: 25452488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of a research-infused botanical curriculum on undergraduates' content knowledge, STEM competencies, and attitudes toward plant sciences.
Ward JR; Clarke HD; Horton JL
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 25185223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Teaching genetics prior to teaching evolution improves evolution understanding but not acceptance.
Mead R; Hejmadi M; Hurst LD
PLoS Biol; 2017 May; 15(5):e2002255. PubMed ID: 28542179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Curriculum design and practice of Genetics blended course under the principle of constructive alignment].
Wu YH; Fan HH; Qian R; Zeng Y; Yao Y; Lin J; Lu DR; Ding Y; Qiao SY
Yi Chuan; 2019 May; 41(5):439-446. PubMed ID: 31106780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Authentic Research in the Classroom Increases Appreciation for Plants in Undergraduate Biology Students.
Hiatt AC; Hove AA; Ward JR; Ventura L; Neufeld HS; Boyd AE; Clarke HD; Horton JL; Murrell ZE
Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Oct; 61(3):969-980. PubMed ID: 34050739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What undergraduate physical education majors learn during a field experience.
O'Sullivan M; Tsangaridou N
Res Q Exerc Sport; 1992 Dec; 63(4):381-92. PubMed ID: 1439163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation of the peer-led team-learning instructional model as a stopgap measure improves student achievement for students opting out of laboratory.
Snyder JJ; Carter BE; Wiles JR
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015 Mar; 14(1):ar2. PubMed ID: 25673354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using paper presentation breaks during didactic lectures improves learning of physiology in undergraduate students.
Ghorbani A; Ghazvini K
Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 26873895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supplemental instruction in introductory biology I: enhancing the performance and retention of underrepresented minority students.
Rath KA; Peterfreund AR; Xenos SP; Bayliss F; Carnal N
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 17785403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning.
Evans DJ; Cuffe T
Anat Sci Educ; 2009 Oct; 2(5):227-33. PubMed ID: 19753627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Teaching at the interface between genetics and law.
Butzel HM
Politics Life Sci; 1986 Aug; 5(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 17153258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anticipation of Personal Genomics Data Enhances Interest and Learning Environment in Genomics and Molecular Biology Undergraduate Courses.
Weber KS; Jensen JL; Johnson SM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133486. PubMed ID: 26241308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education.
Benè KL; Bergus G
Fam Med; 2014; 46(10):783-7. PubMed ID: 25646829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence.
Lockspeiser TM; O'Sullivan P; Teherani A; Muller J
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Aug; 13(3):361-72. PubMed ID: 17124627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of an online medical teaching forum.
Ravindran R; Kashyap M; Lilis L; Vivekanantham S; Phoenix G
Clin Teach; 2014 Jul; 11(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 24917096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Both preparing to teach and teaching positively impact learning outcomes for peer teachers.
Gregory A; Walker I; McLaughlin K; Peets AD
Med Teach; 2011; 33(8):e417-22. PubMed ID: 21774637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neuroscience workshops for fifth-grade school children by undergraduate students: a university-school partnership.
Foy JG; Feldman M; Lin E; Mahoney M; Sjoblom C
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2006; 5(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 17012203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
