123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25453183)
1. Factors affecting tether use and correct use in child restraint installations.
Jermakian JS; Klinich KD; Orton NR; Flannagan CA; Manary MA; Malik LA; Narayanaswamy P
J Safety Res; 2014 Dec; 51():99-108. PubMed ID: 25453183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vehicle LATCH system features associated with correct child restraint installations.
Klinich KD; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT; Manary MA; Moore JL; Wells JK
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):520-31. PubMed ID: 23683089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vehicle characteristics associated with LATCH use and correct use in real-world child restraint installations.
Cicchino JB; Jermakian JS
J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():77-85. PubMed ID: 25934000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing tether anchor labeling and usability in pickup trucks.
Klinich KD; Manary MA; Malik LA; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):287-291. PubMed ID: 29083943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of top tethers with forward-facing child restraints: observations and driver interviews.
Eichelberger AH; Decina LE; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT
J Safety Res; 2014 Feb; 48():71-6. PubMed ID: 24529094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of interventions to make top tether hardware more visible during child restraint system (CRS) installations.
Mansfield JA; Zaragoza-Rivera YN; Baker GH; Bolte JH
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(5):534-539. PubMed ID: 31194584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Observed use of tethers in forward-facing child restraint systems.
Jermakian JS; Wells JK
Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 17(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 21422025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observed LATCH use and misuse characteristics of child restraint systems in seven states.
Decina LE; Lococo KH
J Safety Res; 2007; 38(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 17617236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Field use patterns and performance of child restraints secured by lower anchors and tethers for children (LATCH).
Arbogast KB; Jermakian JS
Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):530-5. PubMed ID: 17270136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantifying the relationship between vehicle interior geometry and child restraint systems.
Sherwood CP; Abdelilah Y; Crandall JR
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2006; 50():381-96. PubMed ID: 16968649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of child restraint system features on installation errors.
Klinich KD; Manary MA; Flannagan CA; Ebert SM; Malik LA; Green PA; Reed MP
Appl Ergon; 2014 Mar; 45(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 23731627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) usability in school buses and passenger vehicles.
Rudin-Brown CM; Scipione A; Armstrong J; Lai G; Salway A; Kumagai J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Oct; 9(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 18836959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in child passenger safety practices in Indiana from 2009 to 2015.
O'Neil J; Bull MJ; Talty J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S191-S194. PubMed ID: 29584489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observational study of child restraining practice on Norwegian high-speed roads: restraint misuse poses a major threat to child passenger safety.
Skjerven-Martinsen ; Naess PA; Hansen TB; Staff T; Stray-Pedersen A
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():479-86. PubMed ID: 23954682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.
Maltese MR; Tylko S; Belwadi A; Locey C; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S103-10. PubMed ID: 25307374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of child restraint misuse on dynamic performance.
Manary MA; Flannagan CAC; Reed MP; Orton NR; Klinich KD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 31670975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usability issues concerning child restraint system harness design.
Rudin-Brown CM; Kumagai JK; Angel HA; Iwasa-Madge KM; Noy YI
Accid Anal Prev; 2003 May; 35(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 12643951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical gaps in child passenger safety practices, surveillance, and legislation: Georgia, 2001.
Staunton C; Davidson S; Kegler S; Dawson L; Powell K; Dellinger A
Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 15687447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
