These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25453319)

  • 21. Determination of waste decay rate for a large Finnish landfill by calibrating methane generation models on the basis of methane recovery and emissions.
    Sormunen K; Laurila T; Rintala J
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23797297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wet landfill decomposition rate determination using methane yield results for excavated waste samples.
    Kim H; Townsend TG
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1427-33. PubMed ID: 22516100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of methane emissions and energy recovery potential from the municipal solid waste landfills of Delhi, India.
    Ghosh P; Shah G; Chandra R; Sahota S; Kumar H; Vijay VK; Thakur IS
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Jan; 272():611-615. PubMed ID: 30385029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of stabilization status of the landfill layers by comparing long-term monitoring data of methane emission with FOD model estimate.
    Nishio T; Fukuyama J; Fukunaga I; Nishitani T; Takakura A; Sakai M; Masuda J
    Environ Technol; 2024 Jul; 45(18):3679-3691. PubMed ID: 37317953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methane emissions from a landfill in north-east India: Performance of various landfill gas emission models.
    Gollapalli M; Kota SH
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Mar; 234():174-180. PubMed ID: 29175479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determination of gas recovery efficiency at two Danish landfills by performing downwind methane measurements and stable carbon isotopic analysis.
    Aghdam EF; Fredenslund AM; Chanton J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():220-229. PubMed ID: 29249311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Field assessment of semi-aerobic condition and the methane correction factor for the semi-aerobic landfills provided by IPCC guidelines.
    Jeong S; Nam A; Yi SM; Kim JY
    Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():197-203. PubMed ID: 25488731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. First-order kinetic gas generation model parameters for wet landfills.
    Faour AA; Reinhart DR; You H
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(7):946-53. PubMed ID: 16843651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of methane production from shredder waste in landfills: The influence of temperature, moisture and metals.
    Fathi Aghdam E; Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():226-237. PubMed ID: 27912989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of landfill gas decay constant for municipal solid waste landfills operated as bioreactors.
    Tolaymat TM; Green RB; Hater GR; Barlaz MA; Black P; Bronson D; Powell J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Jan; 60(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 20102038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adsorption and transport of methane in biochars derived from waste wood.
    Sadasivam BY; Reddy KR
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():218-29. PubMed ID: 26005190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uncontrolled methane emissions from a MSW landfill surface: influence of landfill features and side slopes.
    Di Trapani D; Di Bella G; Viviani G
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2108-15. PubMed ID: 23465313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing the performance of gas collection systems in select Chinese landfills according to the LandGEM model: drawbacks and potential direction.
    Sun Y; Yue D; Li R; Yang T; Liu S
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(23):2912-8. PubMed ID: 26510610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantification of methane emissions from 15 Danish landfills using the mobile tracer dispersion method.
    Mønster J; Samuelsson J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():177-86. PubMed ID: 25442105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characterization of uncertainty in estimation of methane collection from select U.S. landfills.
    Wang X; Nagpure AS; DeCarolis JF; Barlaz MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(3):1545-51. PubMed ID: 25604252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Specific model for the estimation of methane emission from municipal solid waste landfills in India.
    Kumar S; Nimchuk N; Kumar R; Zietsman J; Ramani T; Spiegelman C; Kenney M
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 216():981-7. PubMed ID: 27343450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Methane emissions from Icelandic landfills - A comparison between measured and modelled emissions.
    Scheutz C; Kjeld A; Fredenslund AM
    Waste Manag; 2022 Feb; 139():136-145. PubMed ID: 34968899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A model to estimate the methane generation rate constant in sanitary landfills using fuzzy synthetic evaluation.
    Garg A; Achari G; Joshi RC
    Waste Manag Res; 2006 Aug; 24(4):363-75. PubMed ID: 16941995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Municipal solid waste characterization and its assessment for potential methane generation: a case study.
    Mor S; Ravindra K; De Visscher A; Dahiya RP; Chandra A
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Dec; 371(1-3):1-10. PubMed ID: 16822537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.