753 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25453885)
1. Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide.
Kara K; Mahabadi AA; Rothe H; Müller P; Krüger J; Neubauer H; Klein-Wiele O; Mügge A; Kahlert P; Erbel R
J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Dec; 21(6):822-8. PubMed ID: 25453885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.
Klein-Wiele O; Baliota M; Kara K; Käunicke M; Schäfer H; Garbrecht M; Abdulghafor M; Garmer M; Hailer B
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 28500743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of closure strategies after balloon aortic valvuloplasty: suture mediated versus collagen based versus manual.
Ben-Dor I; Looser P; Bernardo N; Maluenda G; Torguson R; Xue Z; Lindsay J; Pichard AD; Satler LF; Waksman R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 21681898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and safety of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: experience with 1889 interventions for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients.
Lupattelli T; Tannouri F; Garaci FG; Papa G; Pangos M; Somalvico F; Caravaggi C; Faglia E
J Endovasc Ther; 2010 Jun; 17(3):366-75. PubMed ID: 20557177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of suture-based vascular closure devices in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Barbanti M; Capranzano P; Ohno Y; Gulino S; Sgroi C; Immè S; Tamburino C; Cannata S; Patanè M; Di Stefano D; Todaro D; Di Simone E; Deste W; Gargiulo G; Capodanno D; Grasso C; Tamburino C
EuroIntervention; 2015 Oct; 11(6):690-7. PubMed ID: 26499222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the 6-F ExoSeal vascular closure device in antegrade femoral artery punctures.
Maxien D; Behrends B; Eberhardt KM; Saam T; Thieme SF; Reiser MF; Treitl M
J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Dec; 19(6):836-43. PubMed ID: 23210885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suitability of a 7-F ExoSeal Vascular Closure Device for Femoral Artery Punctures Made by 8-F or 9-F Introducer Sheaths.
Goto S; Ohshima T; Ishikawa K; Yamamoto T; Nishizawa T; Shimato S; Kato K
J Endovasc Ther; 2017 Aug; 24(4):516-520. PubMed ID: 28743227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of collagen-based vascular closure devices in patients with vs. without severe peripheral artery disease.
Kara K; Kahlert P; Mahabadi AA; Plicht B; Lind AY; Longwitz D; Bollow M; Erbel R
J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Feb; 21(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 24502487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and time-to-hemostasis of antegrade femoral access closure using the ExoSeal vascular closure device: a retrospective single-center study.
Boschewitz JM; Pieper CC; Andersson M; Nadal J; Schild HH; Meyer C
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 48(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 25201516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilization of collagen-based vascular closure devices in patients with severe peripheral artery disease.
Kara K; Mahabadi AA; Berg MH; Kahlert P; Longwitz D; Erbel R; Bollow M
J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 25(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 23293170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Femoral access-related complications during percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation comparing single versus double Prostar XL device closure.
Saleh N; De Palma R; Settergren M; Rück A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 86(7):1255-61. PubMed ID: 26332528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized trial comparing compression, Perclose Proglide and Angio-Seal VIP for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAP trial.
Martin JL; Pratsos A; Magargee E; Mayhew K; Pensyl C; Nunn M; Day F; Shapiro T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jan; 71(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18098171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy and safety of closure of brachial access using the AngioSeal closure device: experience with 161 interventions in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia.
Lupattelli T; Clerissi J; Clerici G; Minnella DP; Casini A; Losa S; Faglia E
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 47(4):782-8. PubMed ID: 18295438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simplified swift and safe vascular closure device deployment without a local arteriogram: Single center experience in 2074 consecutive patients.
Manolis AS; Georgiopoulos G; Stalikas D; Koulouris S
Indian Heart J; 2016; 68(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 27543479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simple, effective and safe vascular access site closure with the double-ProGlide preclose technique in 162 patients receiving transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Griese DP; Reents W; Diegeler A; Kerber S; Babin-Ebell J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(5):E734-41. PubMed ID: 23765732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the novel Angio-Seal Evolution with Angio-Seal STS closure device.
Lupi A; Rognoni A; Secco GG; Lazzero M; Plebani L; Cossa G; Reale D; Sansa M; Bongo AS; Di Mario C
Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther; 2012 Mar; 24(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 22491159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices.
Duffin DC; Muhlestein JB; Allisson SB; Horne BD; Fowles RE; Sorensen SG; Revenaugh JR; Bair TL; Lappe DL
J Invasive Cardiol; 2001 May; 13(5):354-62. PubMed ID: 11385148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications associated with the arterial puncture closure device--Angio-Seal.
Kadner A; Schmidli J; Schwegler I; Dick F; Schönhoff F; Carrel T; Savolainen H
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2008; 42(3):225-7. PubMed ID: 18230871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
