These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25453904)

  • 1. Estimating pairwise relatedness between individuals with different levels of ploidy.
    Huang K; Ritland K; Guo S; Dunn DW; Chen D; Ren Y; Qi X; Zhang P; He G; Li B
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jul; 15(4):772-84. PubMed ID: 25453904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pairwise relatedness estimator for polyploids.
    Huang K; Ritland K; Guo S; Shattuck M; Li B
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Jul; 14(4):734-44. PubMed ID: 24460904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A maximum-likelihood estimation of pairwise relatedness for autopolyploids.
    Huang K; Guo ST; Shattuck MR; Chen ST; Qi XG; Zhang P; Li BG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Feb; 114(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 25370210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating Relatedness in the Presence of Null Alleles.
    Huang K; Ritland K; Dunn DW; Qi X; Guo S; Li B
    Genetics; 2016 Jan; 202(1):247-60. PubMed ID: 26500259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. StAMPP: an R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed-ploidy level populations.
    Pembleton LW; Cogan NO; Forster JW
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Sep; 13(5):946-52. PubMed ID: 23738873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Demerelate: calculating interindividual relatedness for kinship analysis based on codominant diploid genetic markers using R.
    Kraemer P; Gerlach G
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):1371-1377. PubMed ID: 28281323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 21429111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.
    Oliehoek PA; Windig JJ; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):483-96. PubMed ID: 16510792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology.
    Huelsenbeck JP; Ronquist F; Nielsen R; Bollback JP
    Science; 2001 Dec; 294(5550):2310-4. PubMed ID: 11743192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bioinformatic Pipeline to Estimate Ploidy Level from Target Capture Sequence Data Obtained from Herbarium Specimens.
    Viruel J; Hidalgo O; Pokorny L; Forest F; Gravendeel B; Wilkin P; Leitch IJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2672():115-126. PubMed ID: 37335471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scoredist: a simple and robust protein sequence distance estimator.
    Sonnhammer EL; Hollich V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():108. PubMed ID: 15857510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A generalized framework for AMOVA with multiple hierarchies and ploidies.
    Huang K; Wang T; Dunn DW; Zhang P; Sun H; Li B
    Integr Zool; 2021 Jan; 16(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 32648364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of marker-based pairwise relatedness estimators on a pedigreed plant population.
    Bink MC; Anderson AD; van de Weg WE; Thompson EA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Oct; 117(6):843-55. PubMed ID: 18592205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.
    Milligan BG
    Genetics; 2003 Mar; 163(3):1153-67. PubMed ID: 12663552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference of individual ploidy level using codominant markers.
    Huang K; Dunn DW; Li Z; Zhang P; Dai Y; Li B
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1218-1229. PubMed ID: 31070300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driven apart: the evolution of ploidy differences between the sexes under antagonistic selection.
    Immler S; Otto SP
    Am Nat; 2014 Jan; 183(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 24334739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators.
    Van de Casteele T; Galbusera P; Matthysen E
    Mol Ecol; 2001 Jun; 10(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 11412374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. related: an R package for analysing pairwise relatedness from codominant molecular markers.
    Pew J; Muir PH; Wang J; Frasier TR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 May; 15(3):557-61. PubMed ID: 25186958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.