420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25454249)
1. Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods.
Piñol J; Mir G; Gomez-Polo P; Agustí N
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jul; 15(4):819-30. PubMed ID: 25454249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias.
Clarke LJ; Soubrier J; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Nov; 14(6):1160-70. PubMed ID: 24751203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The choice of universal primers and the characteristics of the species mixture determine when DNA metabarcoding can be quantitative.
Piñol J; Senar MA; Symondson WOC
Mol Ecol; 2019 Jan; 28(2):407-419. PubMed ID: 29939447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines.
Brandon-Mong GJ; Gan HM; Sing KW; Lee PS; Lim PE; Wilson JJ
Bull Entomol Res; 2015 Dec; 105(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 26344799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of primer mismatch, annealing temperature and PCR cycle number on 16S rRNA gene-targetting bacterial community analysis.
Sipos R; Székely AJ; Palatinszky M; Révész S; Márialigeti K; Nikolausz M
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2007 May; 60(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 17343679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
Elbrecht V; Leese F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deconstructing the polymerase chain reaction: understanding and correcting bias associated with primer degeneracies and primer-template mismatches.
Green SJ; Venkatramanan R; Naqib A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0128122. PubMed ID: 25996930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Targeted gene enrichment and high-throughput sequencing for environmental biomonitoring: a case study using freshwater macroinvertebrates.
Dowle EJ; Pochon X; C Banks J; Shearer K; Wood SA
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Sep; 16(5):1240-54. PubMed ID: 26583904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primer ID Validates Template Sampling Depth and Greatly Reduces the Error Rate of Next-Generation Sequencing of HIV-1 Genomic RNA Populations.
Zhou S; Jones C; Mieczkowski P; Swanstrom R
J Virol; 2015 Aug; 89(16):8540-55. PubMed ID: 26041299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A quantitative protocol for DNA metabarcoding of springtails (Collembola).
Saitoh S; Aoyama H; Fujii S; Sunagawa H; Nagahama H; Akutsu M; Shinzato N; Kaneko N; Nakamori T
Genome; 2016 Sep; 59(9):705-23. PubMed ID: 27611697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Priming of a DNA metabarcoding approach for species identification and inventory in marine macrobenthic communities.
Hollatz C; Leite BR; Lobo J; Froufe H; Egas C; Costa FO
Genome; 2017 Mar; 60(3):260-271. PubMed ID: 28145743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seafood Identification in Multispecies Products: Assessment of 16SrRNA, cytb, and COI Universal Primers' Efficiency as a Preliminary Analytical Step for Setting up Metabarcoding Next-Generation Sequencing Techniques.
Giusti A; Tinacci L; Sotelo CG; Marchetti M; Guidi A; Zheng W; Armani A
J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Apr; 65(13):2902-2912. PubMed ID: 28290697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PCR cycles above routine numbers do not compromise high-throughput DNA barcoding results.
Vierna J; Doña J; Vizcaíno A; Serrano D; Jovani R
Genome; 2017 Oct; 60(10):868-873. PubMed ID: 28753409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An improved high throughput sequencing method for studying oomycete communities.
Sapkota R; Nicolaisen M
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Mar; 110():33-9. PubMed ID: 25602160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial metabarcoding by 16S rRNA gene ion torrent amplicon sequencing.
Fantini E; Gianese G; Giuliano G; Fiore A
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1231():77-90. PubMed ID: 25343859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and other mismatches reduce performance of quantitative PCR assays.
Lefever S; Pattyn F; Hellemans J; Vandesompele J
Clin Chem; 2013 Oct; 59(10):1470-80. PubMed ID: 24014836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Taxon-specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces.
Zeale MR; Butlin RK; Barker GL; Lees DC; Jones G
Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Mar; 11(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 21429129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of DNA degradation bias in passive sampling devices on metabarcoding studies of arthropod communities and their associated microbiota.
Krehenwinkel H; Fong M; Kennedy S; Huang EG; Noriyuki S; Cayetano L; Gillespie R
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0189188. PubMed ID: 29304124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of primer/template mismatch effects on real-time PCR amplification of target taxa for GMO quantification.
Ghedira R; Papazova N; Vuylsteke M; Ruttink T; Taverniers I; De Loose M
J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Oct; 57(20):9370-7. PubMed ID: 19778057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metabarcoding a diverse arthropod mock community.
Braukmann TWA; Ivanova NV; Prosser SWJ; Elbrecht V; Steinke D; Ratnasingham S; de Waard JR; Sones JE; Zakharov EV; Hebert PDN
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 May; 19(3):711-727. PubMed ID: 30779309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
