420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25454249)
21. Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies.
O'Donnell JL; Kelly RP; Lowell NC; Port JA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0148698. PubMed ID: 26950069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. DNA metabarcoding to assess indoor fungal communities: Electrostatic dust collectors and Illumina sequencing.
Rocchi S; Valot B; Reboux G; Millon L
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():107-112. PubMed ID: 28559161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ultrasensitive amplicon barcoding for next-generation sequencing facilitating sequence error and amplification-bias correction.
Ahmed I; Tucci FA; Aflalo A; Smith KGC; Bashford-Rogers RJM
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10570. PubMed ID: 32601361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of multiple primer-template mismatches on quantitative PCR accuracy and development of a multi-primer set assay for accurate quantification of pcrA gene sequence variants.
Ledeker BM; De Long SK
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Sep; 94(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 23806694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimating and mitigating amplification bias in qualitative and quantitative arthropod metabarcoding.
Krehenwinkel H; Wolf M; Lim JY; Rominger AJ; Simison WB; Gillespie RG
Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17668. PubMed ID: 29247210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative evaluation of bias in PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing derived from metabarcoding samples.
Pawluczyk M; Weiss J; Links MG; Egaña Aranguren M; Wilkinson MD; Egea-Cortines M
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Mar; 407(7):1841-8. PubMed ID: 25577362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New Primers for Discovering Fungal Diversity Using Nuclear Large Ribosomal DNA.
Asemaninejad A; Weerasuriya N; Gloor GB; Lindo Z; Thorn RG
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159043. PubMed ID: 27391306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Design factors that influence PCR amplification success of cross-species primers among 1147 mammalian primer pairs.
Housley DJ; Zalewski ZA; Beckett SE; Venta PJ
BMC Genomics; 2006 Oct; 7():253. PubMed ID: 17029642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Metabarcoding for the parallel identification of several hundred predators and their prey: Application to bat species diet analysis.
Galan M; Pons JB; Tournayre O; Pierre É; Leuchtmann M; Pontier D; Charbonnel N
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):474-489. PubMed ID: 29288544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Collecting in collections: a PCR strategy and primer set for DNA barcoding of decades-old dried museum specimens.
Mitchell A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Sep; 15(5):1102-11. PubMed ID: 25644663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Polymerase chain reaction, cold probes and clinical diagnosis].
Haras D; Amoros JP
Sante; 1994; 4(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 7909267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance comparison of genetic markers for high-throughput sequencing-based biodiversity assessment in complex communities.
Zhan A; Bailey SA; Heath DD; Macisaac HJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Sep; 14(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 24655333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Blocking human contaminant DNA during PCR allows amplification of rare mammal species from sedimentary ancient DNA.
Boessenkool S; Epp LS; Haile J; Bellemain E; Edwards M; Coissac E; Willerslev E; Brochmann C
Mol Ecol; 2012 Apr; 21(8):1806-15. PubMed ID: 21988749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rapid diagnosis of the economically important fruit fly, Bactrocera correcta (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on a species-specific barcoding cytochrome oxidase I marker.
Jiang F; Li ZH; Deng YL; Wu JJ; Liu RS; Buahom N
Bull Entomol Res; 2013 Jun; 103(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 23458744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reducing amplification artifacts in high multiplex amplicon sequencing by using molecular barcodes.
Peng Q; Vijaya Satya R; Lewis M; Randad P; Wang Y
BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):589. PubMed ID: 26248467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Streamlining DNA barcoding protocols: automated DNA extraction and a new cox1 primer in arachnid systematics.
Vidergar N; Toplak N; Kuntner M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113030. PubMed ID: 25415202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A simplified arthropod genomic-DNA extraction protocol for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based specimen identification through barcoding.
Margam VM; Gachomo EW; Shukle JH; Ariyo OO; Seufferheld MJ; Kotchoni SO
Mol Biol Rep; 2010 Oct; 37(7):3631-5. PubMed ID: 20204529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Molecular detection of invertebrate prey in vertebrate diets: trophic ecology of Caribbean island lizards.
Kartzinel TR; Pringle RM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jul; 15(4):903-14. PubMed ID: 25545675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison and validation of some ITS primer pairs useful for fungal metabarcoding studies.
Op De Beeck M; Lievens B; Busschaert P; Declerck S; Vangronsveld J; Colpaert JV
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e97629. PubMed ID: 24933453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative effects of position and type of single mismatch on single base primer extension.
Wu JH; Hong PY; Liu WT
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Jun; 77(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 19285527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
