672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25454415)
1. Improved risk stratification by the integration of the revised international prognostic scoring system with the myelodysplastic syndromes comorbidity index.
van Spronsen MF; Ossenkoppele GJ; Holman R; van de Loosdrecht AA
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Dec; 50(18):3198-205. PubMed ID: 25454415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) predicts survival and leukemic evolution of myelodysplastic syndromes significantly better than IPSS and WHO Prognostic Scoring System: validation by the Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie Italian Regional Database.
Voso MT; Fenu S; Latagliata R; Buccisano F; Piciocchi A; Aloe-Spiriti MA; Breccia M; Criscuolo M; Andriani A; Mancini S; Niscola P; Naso V; Nobile C; Piccioni AL; D'Andrea M; D'Addosio A; Leone G; Venditti A
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(21):2671-7. PubMed ID: 23796988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) still standard in predicting prognosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome? External validation of the WHO Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) and comparison with IPSS.
Park MJ; Kim HJ; Kim SH; Kim DH; Kim SJ; Jang JH; Kim K; Kim WS; Jung CW
Eur J Haematol; 2008 Nov; 81(5):364-73. PubMed ID: 18637029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High flow cytometric scores identify adverse prognostic subgroups within the revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.
Alhan C; Westers TM; Cremers EM; Cali C; Witte BI; Ossenkoppele GJ; van de Loosdrecht AA
Br J Haematol; 2014 Oct; 167(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 24976502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Savic A; Marisavljevic D; Kvrgic V; Stanisavljevic N
Acta Haematol; 2014; 131(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 24335346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) for myelodysplastic syndromes and comparison with the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). A study of the International Working Group for Prognosis in Myelodysplasia (IWG-PM).
Della Porta MG; Tuechler H; Malcovati L; Schanz J; Sanz G; Garcia-Manero G; Solé F; Bennett JM; Bowen D; Fenaux P; Dreyfus F; Kantarjian H; Kuendgen A; Levis A; Cermak J; Fonatsch C; Le Beau MM; Slovak ML; Krieger O; Luebbert M; Maciejewski J; Magalhaes SM; Miyazaki Y; Pfeilstöcker M; Sekeres MA; Sperr WR; Stauder R; Tauro S; Valent P; Vallespi T; van de Loosdrecht AA; Germing U; Haase D; Greenberg PL; Cazzola M
Leukemia; 2015 Jul; 29(7):1502-13. PubMed ID: 25721895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Refinement of the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) by including LDH as an additional prognostic variable to improve risk assessment in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
Germing U; Hildebrandt B; Pfeilstöcker M; Nösslinger T; Valent P; Fonatsch C; Lübbert M; Haase D; Steidl C; Krieger O; Stauder R; Giagounidis AA; Strupp C; Kündgen A; Mueller T; Haas R; Gattermann N; Aul C
Leukemia; 2005 Dec; 19(12):2223-31. PubMed ID: 16193087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic scoring systems for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in a population-based setting: a report from the Swedish MDS register.
Moreno Berggren D; Folkvaljon Y; Engvall M; Sundberg J; Lambe M; Antunovic P; Garelius H; Lorenz F; Nilsson L; Rasmussen B; Lehmann S; Hellström-Lindberg E; Jädersten M; Ejerblad E
Br J Haematol; 2018 Jun; 181(5):614-627. PubMed ID: 29707769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The application of a new prognostic score system for 435 cases of primary myelodysplastic syndrome diagnosed with WHO classification].
Wang XQ;
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 48(8):633-7. PubMed ID: 19954053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic relevance of morphological classification models for myelodysplastic syndromes in an era of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System.
van Spronsen MF; Ossenkoppele GJ; Westers TM; van de Loosdrecht AA
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Mar; 56():10-20. PubMed ID: 26798967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems.
Bektaş Ö; Üner A; Eliaçık E; Uz B; Işık A; Etgül S; Bozkurt S; Haznedaroğlu İC; Göker H; Sayınalp N; Aksu S; Demiroğlu H; Özcebe Oİ; Büyükaşık Y
Turk J Haematol; 2016 Jun; 33(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 26376664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the MD Anderson Prognostic Risk Model for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
Komrokji RS; Corrales-Yepez M; Al Ali N; Kharfan-Dabaja M; Padron E; Fields T; Lancet JE; List AF
Cancer; 2012 May; 118(10):2659-64. PubMed ID: 21956402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of risk stratification tools in predicting outcomes of patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azanucleosides.
Zeidan AM; Sekeres MA; Garcia-Manero G; Steensma DP; Zell K; Barnard J; Ali NA; Zimmerman C; Roboz G; DeZern A; Nazha A; Jabbour E; Kantarjian H; Gore SD; Maciejewski JP; List A; Komrokji R;
Leukemia; 2016 Mar; 30(3):649-57. PubMed ID: 26464171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IPSS-R in 555 Taiwanese patients with primary MDS: Integration of monosomal karyotype can better risk-stratify the patients.
Yang YT; Hou HA; Liu CY; Lin CC; Chou WC; Lee FY; Liu MC; Liu CW; Tang JL; Yao M; Li CC; Kuo YY; Huang SY; Ko BS; Chen CY; Hsu SC; Lin CT; Wu SJ; Tsay W; Chen YC; Tien HF
Am J Hematol; 2014 Sep; 89(9):E142-9. PubMed ID: 24845799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognostic utility of risk stratification tools in patients with therapy-related vs de novo myelodysplastic syndromes: a report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium.
Zeidan AM; Al Ali N; Barnard J; Padron E; Lancet JE; Sekeres MA; Steensma DP; DeZern A; Roboz G; Jabbour E; Garcia-Manero G; List A; Komrokji R
Leukemia; 2017 Jun; 31(6):1391-1397. PubMed ID: 28111463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The myelodysplastic syndromes: analysis of prognostic factors and comparison of prognostic systems in 128 Chinese patients from a single institution.
Zhao WL; Xu L; Wu W; Yan H; Tang W; Hu J; Chen Y; Li JM; Zeng XY; Xiong SM; Shen ZX; Chen Z; Wang ZY; Chen SJ
Hematol J; 2002; 3(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 12111649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Hematologic response predictor factors in adults with myelodysplastic syndromes (SMD) treated with cyclosporin A (CSA)].
Zamora-Pérez E; López-Karpovitch X
Gac Med Mex; 2015; 151(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26089271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age and comorbidities deeply impact on clinical outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Balleari E; Salvetti C; Del Corso L; Filiberti R; Bacigalupo A; Bellodi A; Beltrami G; Bergamaschi M; Berisso G; Calzamiglia T; Carella AM; Cavalleri M; Da Col A; Favorini S; Forni GL; Goretti R; Miglino M; Mitscheuning L; Molinari E; Racchi O; Scudeletti M; Tassara R; Gobbi M; Lemoli R; Clavio M
Leuk Res; 2015 Aug; 39(8):846-52. PubMed ID: 26145790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Study on prognostic significances of different cytogenetic risk categories in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes].
Qu SQ; Liu XP; Xu ZF; Zhang Y; Qin TJ; Zhang TJ; Cui R; Hao YS; Xiao ZJ
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 32(12):819-24. PubMed ID: 22339954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enumerating bone marrow blasts from nonerythroid cellularity improves outcome prediction in myelodysplastic syndromes and permits a better definition of the intermediate risk category of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R).
Calvo X; Arenillas L; Luño E; Senent L; Arnan M; Ramos F; Pedro C; Tormo M; Montoro J; Díez-Campelo M; Blanco ML; Arrizabalaga B; Xicoy B; Bonanad S; Jerez A; Nomdedeu M; Ferrer A; Sanz GF; Florensa L
Am J Hematol; 2017 Jul; 92(7):614-621. PubMed ID: 28370234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
