These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25454528)

  • 1. CBCT technology for diagnosis and treatment planning: what general practitioners should consider.
    Jansen CE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):749-53; quiz 754, 756. PubMed ID: 25454528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before-after study.
    Shelley AM; Ferrero A; Brunton P; Goodwin M; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140316. PubMed ID: 25472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
    Landin M; Jadhav A; Yadav S; Tadinada A
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnosis and conservative treatment of a complex type 3 dens invaginatus using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D plastic models.
    Kfir A; Telishevsky-Strauss Y; Leitner A; Metzger Z
    Int Endod J; 2013 Mar; 46(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 23137215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
    Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement.
    Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.
    Ganz SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
    Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2011 Jul; 55(3):515-36, viii. PubMed ID: 21726687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focus on: CBCT technology.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2012 May; 31(5):17. PubMed ID: 22650085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies.
    Wismeijer D; Joda T; Flügge T; Fokas G; Tahmaseb A; Bechelli D; Bohner L; Bornstein M; Burgoyne A; Caram S; Carmichael R; Chen CY; Coucke W; Derksen W; Donos N; El Kholy K; Evans C; Fehmer V; Fickl S; Fragola G; Gimenez Gonzales B; Gholami H; Hashim D; Hui Y; Kökat A; Vazouras K; Kühl S; Lanis A; Leesungbok R; van der Meer J; Liu Z; Sato T; De Souza A; Scarfe WC; Tosta M; van Zyl P; Vach K; Vaughn V; Vucetic M; Wang P; Wen B; Wu V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():436-442. PubMed ID: 30328201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21507612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digitally enhanced dentistry: the power of digital design.
    Guichet D
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Mar; 43(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 25864301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
    Chan HL; Misch K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical applications of digital 2-D and 3-D radiography for the periodontist.
    Eshraghi T; McAllister N; McAllister B
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):36-45. PubMed ID: 23040338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone beam CT for diagnosis and treatment planning in trauma cases.
    Palomo L; Palomo JM
    Dent Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 53(4):717-27, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 19958908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.