These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25454584)

  • 1. Orienting asymmetries in dogs' responses to different communicatory components of human speech.
    Ratcliffe VF; Reby D
    Curr Biol; 2014 Dec; 24(24):2908-12. PubMed ID: 25454584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural mechanisms for lexical processing in dogs.
    Andics A; Gábor A; Gácsi M; Faragó T; Szabó D; Miklósi Á
    Science; 2016 Sep; 353(6303):1030-1032. PubMed ID: 27576923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are temporal features crucial acoustic cues in dog vocal recognition?
    Siniscalchi M; Lusito R; Sasso R; Quaranta A
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Sep; 15(5):815-21. PubMed ID: 22544303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemispheric Specialization for Processing the Communicative and Emotional Content of Vocal Communication in a Social Mammal, the Domestic Pig.
    Leliveld LMC; Düpjan S; Tuchscherer A; Puppe B
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2020; 14():596758. PubMed ID: 33328923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dogs perceive and spontaneously normalize formant-related speaker and vowel differences in human speech sounds.
    Root-Gutteridge H; Ratcliffe VF; Korzeniowska AT; Reby D
    Biol Lett; 2019 Dec; 15(12):20190555. PubMed ID: 31795850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of human command phonetic characteristics on auditory cognition in dogs (Canis familiaris).
    Fukuzawa M; Mills DS; Cooper JJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2005 Feb; 119(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 15740436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The processing of prosody: Evidence of interhemispheric specialization at the age of four.
    Wartenburger I; Steinbrink J; Telkemeyer S; Friedrich M; Friederici AD; Obrig H
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jan; 34(1):416-25. PubMed ID: 17056277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communication between domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans: dogs are good learners.
    Elgier AM; Jakovcevic A; Barrera G; Mustaca AE; Bentosela M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jul; 81(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 19520240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alteration of expected hemispheric asymmetries: valence and arousal effects in neuropsychological models of emotion.
    Alfano KM; Cimino CR
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 17928118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orienting asymmetries and physiological reactivity in dogs' response to human emotional faces.
    Siniscalchi M; d'Ingeo S; Quaranta A
    Learn Behav; 2018 Dec; 46(4):574-585. PubMed ID: 29923158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric lateralization of linguistic prosody recognition in comparison to speech and speaker recognition.
    Kreitewolf J; Friederici AD; von Kriegstein K
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():332-44. PubMed ID: 25087482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs' sensitivity to human actions.
    Udell MA; Dorey NR; Wynne CD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2010 May; 85(2):327-45. PubMed ID: 19961472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3373-86. PubMed ID: 19425677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans' attentional focus.
    Virányi Z; Topál J; Gácsi M; Miklósi A; Csányi V
    Behav Processes; 2004 May; 66(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 15110918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does affective information influence domestic dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) point-following behavior?
    Flom R; Gartman P
    Anim Cogn; 2016 Mar; 19(2):317-27. PubMed ID: 26515451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition.
    Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 24134065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Affective and linguistic processing of speech prosody: DC potential studies.
    Pihan H
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():269-84. PubMed ID: 17015085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing.
    Steinhauer K; Alter K; Friederici AD
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Feb; 2(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 10195205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adapting to suprasegmental lexical stress errors in foreign-accented speech.
    Reinisch E; Weber A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1165-76. PubMed ID: 22894235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 6():62. PubMed ID: 16225699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.